Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 0 <br /> 1320E3nerma DEEM=;Zgx POI COMtoeMOZCr W91278--06-2r8007 <br /> XIM 1ATIVB DIC23 =min=i op MMUS <br /> SUPPOS'L'NG MACW/REVAlnises r:. 11E3PtHsn =PL. MA., <br /> Nd, SC, HD, Tar , .?1/0 Ai,. <br /> PERVORANCEsuxvr NUM <br /> Me =tract= <br /> + . I <br /> 1. Provided experienced arrangers and supervisors 1 + 2 3 .4 5 of fib ' <br /> with the tncrmir41 and administrative abilities I �f <br /> needed to neat contra requirements. <br /> 2. Demonatrated ability to biro, maintain, and_ 2 2 3 I 4 rV l 6 NA, <br /> replace, if necessary, qualified personnel doting <br /> the oontract Period. <br /> 3, Delegated'authority to project managers and 1' 2 3 1 4 ( 5 116/ Ah <br /> supervisors Co m mstisate with contract <br /> Sepua xealents. <br /> 4. Rama office par•4r4_'+ated in solving significant. 1 1 2 3 j 6 1 5 c,r� 51 <br /> I kcal problems. J !+�'" <br /> 5. Followed app oared 9uaIrmy control plan and 1 2 3 1-4 5 �* { RA <br /> [Conformed to caicxaot spa ificationn. ` <br /> 6. Provided efzem-dye quality control and/or 1 '2 -3 4 Y 6 1-NA <br /> inspection procedures tanner contract <br /> reoairemsnre. <br /> 1. Cozzecttad dePirenciee in timely+ear,ner and j 1 : 2 3 a 5 ri NA ' <br /> pu: rt to tka4r mmlity control coca, ee.. j lF <br /> 8. 1 Proviclad timely resolution"of contract 1 1 12 1 3 4 s 6�I NA <br /> diecrepana.te . E' <br /> 3- fi Identified x.sks/trifWi.emu as they occu=ed. 1 1 2 3 4 6 6 His+ <br /> 10. ISoggeated alternative approaches to problems. 1 2 3 4 5,r 6 RRA <br /> 11. —Displayed initiative to salve problens. 1 2 3 4 5 ne NA <br /> 12. Developed realistic progress schedules. J I 1 2 3 4 bf 6 NA . <br /> 13. met e5 '4 +ed project scbednles. 1 2 13 4 6 NA <br /> 14. Provided timely =ablution o_ warranty defects: - 1 2 1 3 ' 4 5 I ,I ITR <br /> 15.Was responsive to contract caanges. 1 Y <br /> 2 3 4 5' 64. AA <br /> 16. I Provided adequate project supervision. -71-1 <br /> 1 1 2 3 4 5 6,� NA <br /> 17. : Obtained consent of surety for increases in 1 2 3 4 V .66 W7 <br /> bonding as work-in-progress increased. lr <br /> 1E. I Raid subeoatrattors/supnliera in a t4nwly manner.'. 2 3 4 6Tti�, <br /> ':9. Provided accurate and complete cost proposals ' 1 21 I <br /> 3 4 5 6,, Nh <br /> including all aspects of work required for each; V <br /> ttntraet change. <br /> 20. 4 Coo orated with Government personnel atter. award. I a. 12 1 3 I 4 I : 1.6' 1 Hr. <br /> 21. Was the cw,i.r.dctar ever issued a cure or show cause =rite <br /> under the.referenced contract? If yes, exnlain outcome in :1;S no <br /> 'remarY.E.` <br /> 22. Would you award seethe= contract to this contractor? <br /> I not, erpla.in in "rPmarFs.'7. (1• rNo <br /> aOPESaIz EV?.T,umzeez off' cmiam'+ows �. 12 I„.r.--i--- T.----1-7.0._ <br /> C I'5 <br /> . Ceres Environmental Services, Inc. Page 6-39 <br />