My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CERES
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 18-04-02 Disaster Debris Management and Removal Services
>
Responses
>
CERES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2018 1:57:44 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 3:33:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Disaster Debris Management
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
18-04-02
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFP
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
mitorams <br /> mammara.z cos2s2ms &U8 C4 892278-06-8-0007 <br /> CON Ra ITEMS B (txI) STWORATO ROW SIMMS <br /> gagpogaamm tram.tm/E2w143133As=t a: 32 2N 81. [vim, <br /> NC. SC. US, I.A. T%, MID M. _ <br /> SURVEY Bred <br /> The contractor:: <br /> 1. P. vided a e-tienced�nagers and supervisors 1 2 3 4 5 6 H& <br /> with the techn{ce- and administrative abilities <br /> nPadPri to meet contract regtli—ranenta. � <br /> 2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and 1 2 3 4 f5� 6 HA <br /> replace, if necessary, qualified personnel 111i'-ing �`// <br /> the contract period. <br /> 3. Delegated anthnrity to project managers and 1- 2 3 4 V 6 NA_ <br /> supervisors coswsnemrate with contract <br /> requirements. <br /> 4. Some nisirw. part c patad in solving significant 1 2 3 4 5 6 NA <br /> local prablems. <br /> 5. -Eollawed anpraved quality control plan and 1 2 3 40. 5 - 6 NA <br /> conformed to contract apPrifirZtiana. <br /> 6. Provided effective quality control and/or 1 '2 3 4 5 0 NA <br /> inspection procedures to meet contract <br /> _ <br /> requirements. <br /> 7. corrected rli.fir1.tnr4 in timely some= and 1 2 3 4 5 6 NE <br /> pursuant to chair, garatty control prn__ced res. <br /> 8. 3srovided ti me r y resolution of contract 1 2' 3 4 . 0► 6 NA <br /> discrepancies. <br /> V <br /> 9. Trunci fi ed =Lekstproblems as they occurred. 1 2 3 9 5 V NA <br /> 10. 'Suggested alternative appraai:has to problems, 1 2 3 4 54:11NP. <br /> 11. "Displayed initiative to solve problems. 1 2 3 4 a'--6 HA <br /> -12. Deireloped realistic progress schedules. 1 2 3 4 5 6 NA <br /> ® 13. tat established project schedules. 1 2 3 4 5 F 6! tea <br /> 14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. 1 12 3 - 4 6 NA <br /> 15. Was responsive to contract changes. 1 2. 3 4 !`af 6 NA <br /> 16. Provided adequate project suueruision. 1 2 3 4 V 6 NA <br /> 17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in 1 ' 2 3 r4 5 6 HA <br /> tmnding as work-in-Progress ;n-,-Pared. � <br /> 18. Paid � <br /> contractors/ lieia in a timely manner_ 11_ 2 3 (�� 5 6 NA <br /> 19. '-Provided accurate and complete cost proposals I 1 2 3 l.J 5 6 NA <br /> inclmrfiittg all aspects of work required fox each <br /> contract change. <br /> 20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. T 1 2 13 4—/5) , 6 NA <br /> 21. Was the actor aver issued a =a or show cause notice <br /> L <br /> under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in YES O <br /> 'remarks.' <br /> 22. Would you award another contract to this contractor? <br /> If not, avian in "remarks." NO <br /> 23. I OVERLT.r. =MAT= Cff C 's i t 1 2 13 14 (11 l 6 1 <br /> Ceres Environmental Services, Inc. Page 6-42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.