My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2018-2821
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2018
>
Reso 2018-2821
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 4:03:22 PM
Creation date
5/22/2018 3:56:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2018-2821
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
05/17/2018
Description
Amd Reso No. 2017-2750 to Adopt Rev. Guidelines for Art Work for Multifamily and Commercial Proj
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
eo, <br /> € \. <br /> SUN <br /> Art Guidelines <br /> Recommendations for the selection of artwork for private and public locations will be <br /> based on the following guidelines, as they may be amended from time to time. <br /> • What artistic merit does the artwork have and how is this accomplished? Is there an <br /> inherent quality and sense of excellence? <br /> • How does the artwork foster the overall goals of the Cultural Master Plan? Does it <br /> accomplish the purpose of this Program? <br /> • Relevance and overall positive impact of the artwork under consideration to the City, <br /> including its values, culture, and people. Consideration will be given to whether it has <br /> historical value, addresses a social or environmental issue, or addresses the <br /> community as a whole or a specific interest in this culturally diverse community? <br /> • Explain how the design of the artwork is visionary and creative? How does it engage <br /> the community and invite interest? What about it is thought-provoking, entertaining, <br /> whimsical, original and/or representative of high artistic excellence in urban design <br /> and public art? Describe how it has emotional, inspirational, educational or <br /> intellectual impact? Overall, does it uniquely enhance community identity and <br /> generally enhance the public realm? <br /> • Relationship of the artwork to the site, i.e., does it serves to activate, enhance or <br /> foster community involvement/ public participation in that particular public space? <br /> How? Are the sites selected varied so as to be particularly enjoyed by the population <br /> living nearby? <br /> • Appropriateness of the artwork or design enhancement in terms of scale, materials, <br /> form and content to the site should be evaluated. How do the scale, form and content <br /> serve a functional purpose? In what way does it otherwise enhance or define a civic <br /> space? <br /> • Consideration should be given to structural and surface integrity, permanence and <br /> outdoor protection of the artwork against theft, vandalism, weathering, and excessive <br /> maintenance and repair costs. <br /> • Experience of the artist in the creation of artwork must be part of the criteria. Does <br /> the artist have a successful track record, having executed and installed works of art <br /> Exhibit "A" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.