My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2018-2825
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2018
>
Reso 2018-2825
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2018 11:52:52 AM
Creation date
5/22/2018 3:58:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2018-2825
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
05/17/2018
Description
Awd RFP No. 18-04-02 Debris Mgmt & Removal Svcs & Auth Auth CM to Negotiate & Exe Agmt
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> ADDENDUM # 1 <br /> DATE: May 8, 2018 / <br /> TO:ALL PROPOSERS <br /> FROM: Purchasing Agent <br /> RFP NO.: RFP 18-04-02 <br /> TITLE: RFP 18-04-02 Disaster Debris Management and Removal Services <br /> SUBJECT:Addendum No. 1 <br /> BID SUBMITTAL DEADLINE:Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 2:30 PM <br /> Please attach this addendum to the documents in your possession and include the Acknowledgement <br /> of Addenda form with your response incorporated in the RFP.This addendum is and does become a <br /> part of the Disaster Debris Management and Removal Services RFP. <br /> Questions & Answers: <br /> 1. There is a significant cost difference and amount of labor required to grind C&D debris versus grinding <br /> vegetative debris. Would the City consider adding a separate line item for reduction of C&D via grinding? <br /> A:Yes, please add the line item for C&D grinding as line 3.35 part of Schedule 3 of the price proposal. <br /> 2. Would the City consider accepting compaction as an accepted form of reducing C&D debris?A:Yes, <br /> however any damage caused to the temp site by any compaction equipment or grinding equipment <br /> for C&D must be repaired by the contractor. <br /> 3. Please explain specifically how the pricing of one proposal will be evaluated against the pricing from <br /> another proposal, including the answer to these questions: <br /> a.Will each pricing proposal be analyzed and refined to become one total number which can then <br /> be compared to the other proposals,and if so,what is the formula that will be used to derive that <br /> total number? A: Various price analysis methods may be utilized to determine the best value <br /> among all proposers. - <br /> b. Will extended totals (unit price multiplied by estimated quantity) be used to evaluate pricing, <br /> and if so,what estimated quantities and what line items will be used to derive the extended totals <br /> that will be evaluated? A: The City may use several evaluation formulas i.e. based on total <br /> amount of debris generated,most used services, etc. <br /> c. Will all pricing line items be evaluated equally or will some line items receive more importance <br /> in the evaluation?A: Not necessarily.As mentioned before,various price analysis methods may <br /> be utilized to determine the best value. <br /> 4. Is there an existing contract similar to this in place or previously in place?Are the bid tabulations <br /> available?A:Attached is the City's previous contract for debris clearing and removal services. <br /> 5. Does the City have disposal rates for local C&D, Class 1 and Class 3 waste? A: Rates are determined at <br /> the time of disposal and should be considered as a pass through cost. (As in,they pay up front and bill <br /> us for actual with verified official dump tickets from the dump site. <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.