Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 2024-3765RESOLUTION NO. 2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SUNNY ISLES BEACH, FLORIDA, EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR A COLLABORATIVE INITIATIVE REQUESTING THAT THE MIAMI-DADE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIZE A STUDY ADDRESSING TRAFFIC CONGESTION AT THE INTERSECTION OF 163RD STREETAND BISCAYNE BOULEVARD; AUTHORIZING THE MAYORAND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A JOINT LETTER WITH NEIGHBORING CITIES; PROVIDING FOR DISTRIBUTION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, 16311 Street and Biscayne Boulevard (the "Intersection") is a critical corridor providing access from 1-95 to the City of Sunny Isles Beach (the "City"), North Miami Beach, Golden Beach, Aventura, Bal Harbour, and unincorporated areas of Miami -Dade County (collectively "Agencies"); and WHEREAS, the Intersection is experiencing increasing traffic congestion due to regional developments and increased railway activity associated with the Northeast Corridor project, including the forthcoming train station at NE 1511t Street; and WHEREAS, this congestion negatively impacts commerce, safety, environmental quality, and emergency response times within the City and neighboring communities; and WHEREAS, the Miami -Dade Transportation Planning Organization ("TPO") and the Florida Department of Transportation ("FDOT") are key agencies responsible for transportation planning and infrastructure improvements within the region; and WHEREAS, the Agencies desire to request that TPO and FDOT prioritize a study to identify viable options for alleviating congestion at this critical Intersection; and WHEREAS, integrating roadway improvements into the existing Northeast Corridor project will facilitate comprehensive solutions addressing both rail and road transportation needs; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that it is in the best interest of the City and its residents to support this collaborative initiative. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SUNNY ISLES BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Support for Collaborative Request. The City Commission hereby expresses its support fora collaborative request to the Miami -Dade Transportation Planning Organization and the Florida Department of Transportation to prioritize a study addressing traffic congestion at the intersection of 163rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard. Section 2. Authorization to Execute Joint Letter. The City Commission authorizes the Mayor @BCL@BCOA037F.Doc Page 1 of 2 608 and the City Manager to execute the joint letter attached hereto as Exhibit "A", along with representatives from the cities of North Miami Beach, Golden Beach, Aventura, and Bal Harbour, and to take any necessary actions to facilitate its distribution. Section 3. Directive to the City Clerk. The City Clerk is directed to distribute a copy of this Resolution and the executedjoint letterto the Miami -Dade Transportation Planning Organization, the Florida Department of Transportation District Six, and the municipalities of North Miami Beach, Golden Beach,Aventura, and Bal Harbour. Section 4. Authorization of Mayor. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute said Resolution. Section 5. Authorization of City Manager. The City Manager is hereby authorized to do all things necessary to effectuate the terms of this Resolution. Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED upon this 211t77- Larisa , 2024. Svechin, Mayor ATTEST: /11 APPROVED AS TO FORM A %I / I AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: Mauricio Betancor, CMC, City Clerk A ao"W Alain E. Boileau for Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A., City Attorney Moved by: ►C� l '� l%�`- �'7 Seconded by:/`7/��SS/�/�((�� I Vote: Mayor Svechin (Yes) (No) Vice Mayor Lama ✓ (Yes) (No) Commissioner Joseph ,/ (Yes) (No) Commissioner Stuyvesant (Yes) (No) Commissioner Viscarra (Yes) (No) @BCL@BCOA037F.Doc Page 2 of 2 609 Executive Director Aileen Boucle, AICP Miami -Dade Transportation Planning Organization 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 1900 Miami, FL 33130 District Six Secretary Stacy L. Miller, P.E. Florida Department of Transportation, District Six 1000 NW 111th Avenue Miami, FL 33172 Subject: Collective Request for Prioritization of Traffic Congestion Studies on 163rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard Dear Executive Director Boucle and Secretary Miller, On behalf of the cities of North Miami Beach, Sunny Isles Beach, Golden Beach, Aventura, and Bal Harbour, we are writing to express our collective concern regarding the increasing traffic congestion along 163rd Street, particularly at its intersection with Biscayne Boulevard. This corridor is a vital artery providing access from I-95 to .our communities and unincorporated areas of Miami -Dade County. We are aware of and support the ongoing development of the Northeast Corridor project, including the forthcoming train station at NE 151st Street, as part ;.of the Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit (SMART) Plan. While we welcome these enhancements to regional transit, we have observed that the increased railway activity has intensified traffic congestion at the intersection of 163rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard. The strain on our road infrastructure has become increasingly pronounced, and we believe that addressing this issue in conjunction with the Northeast Corridor project is ;essential. . We respectfully request that the scope of the Northeast Corridor project be amended to include a study of viable roadway improvements at the intersection of 163rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard that facilitate the free. flow of:east-west traffic while accommodating increased railway usage.' By integrating roadway, improvements into the existing Northeast Corridor project, we can develop comprehensive solutions that address both rail and road transportation needs. This holistic approach will enhance mobility, reduce travel times, improve safety, and ultimately improve the quality of life for our residents and visitors. To underscore the urgency of this matter, we would like to highlight: Economic Impact: The congestion negatively affects commerce by delaying the transport of goods and services, impacting local businesses and the regional economy. 610 Safety Concerns: Increased traffic congestion heightens the risk of accidents, posing safety hazards to motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists. Additionally, congestion can delay response times for first responders, compromising public safety during emergencies. Environmental Considerations: Prolonged idling in traffic contributes to higher emissions, adversely affecting air quality and conflicting with our collective environmental sustainability goals. Population Growth: Our cities are experiencing steady population growth, which will only exacerbate current traffic issues if not addressed promptly. We are eager to collaborate with the Miami -Dade TPO, FDOT and the railway agencies on this important initiative. Our cities are committed to supporting efforts that will lead to sustainable and efficient transportation systems in our region. Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. We look forward to your favorable consideration and are available to discuss this further at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions or require further information, please feel free to contact North Miami Beach City Manager Mario Diaz at 305-948-2900 or Mario.diaz@citynmb.com. Sincerely, 611 PROJECT GOALS )MIAMI -DADS '] SMART i PLAN P Mlarr'=WftftnsHnn Flanning o*.Q01&01t0t The goal of the Land Use Scenario and Visioning Planning Study is to integrate transportation and land use planning to maximize the effectiveness of transit investments in the corridor. The purpose of the SMART Plan is to provide mobility options for Miami -Dade County residents and visitors and promote economic competitiveness by investing in the County's transportation infrastructure while protecting the environment and maximizing the efficiency of the existing transportation system. Why We Are Here—SMART Plan Purpose From n -functional and feasible perspective i4`Ilt�t hF �. It. is Vital to our quality,o'I"',life First/Last Mile Connections: • Extend the range of Transit Supportive Areas • Facilitate access in the Transit Core • Facilitate mobility in Transit Neighborh 612 IN nr tiL A N SMART ���1�1�1 I ;1,ihiPJllyd"I� PLAN T PQ mr I �i�.itii511' 1 Brad,* } .ma�. . The Preferred Land Use Scenario for the Northeast Corridor is the result of scenario development, evaluation, and selection process. Population and employment growth is distributed along the corridor to the expected trend (2040) growth. Downtown remains a regional center for residential and employment activities. Preferred Scenario (PS) Socioeconomic Data Summary Projected Population: 262,000 (2040) to 307,000 (PS) An increase of 44,500 in popula- tion or 16% higher than in 2040 Projected Employment: 158,000 (2040) to 188,000 (PS) An increase of 30,000 in employ- ment or 18% higher than in 2040 Projected 2040 and Preferred Scenario Average Weekday Corridor Boardings : 11,400 —15,500 36 % increase in total boardings with Preferred Land Use Scenario Northeast Corridor Station Areas The limits of the Northeast Corridor are from Downtown Miami to the City of Aventura along the existing FEC railway for an approximate length of 14.5 miles. The municipalities within the corridor are Miami, EI Portal, Miami Shores, Biscayne Park, North Miami, North Miami Beach, and Aventura. The Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) study has so far identified the transit mode (commuter rail), alignment (existing FEC railroad) and preliminary station locations. However, the PD&E study is currently on hold until negotiations with FEC Railway for securing track access are complete along with identifying funding sources for operations and maintenance. This project would be the southernmost part of the planned Tri -Rail Coastal Link commuter service. The proposed stations that are the basis of the population, employment and ridership projections shown here are: *Aventura ♦ NE 79 St./EI Portal ♦ Wynwood/Edgewater ♦ North Miami Beach ♦ Midtown/Design ♦ Downtown Miami ♦ North Miami District PREFERRED TECHNOLOGY WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? muter Rail (e.g. Tri -Rail) often runs on rail lines also used by freight and long distance enger service (CSX, FEC). Compared to Heavy Rail (eg. Metrorail) it involves longer ce lines and less frequent service. It moves passengers between communities rather within them. The series of Charrettes identified the below three types of Urban Centers suitable for development around the proposed stations: Metropolitan ®, WE fek -3• Downtown' Micl riven Desi n `fo o.r h Mia►iii, ci r Fr¢ 1 .. y ic, I .`1 MiamiCentral 'District' ' at NE 125 Street`'" Station 4 City of North 4 EI Portal/ Miami Beach at City of Miami at NE 163 Street NE 79 Street 4 City of Aventura at NE 197 Street 613 MIAMI -WOE SMART PLAN T PQ Northeast Corridor Station Areas The limits of the Northeast Corridor are from Downtown Miami to the City of Aventura along the existing FEC railway for an approximate length of 14.5 miles. The municipalities within the corridor are Miami, EI Portal, Miami Shores, Biscayne Park, North Miami, North Miami Beach, and Aventura. The Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) study has so far identified the transit mode (commuter rail), alignment (existing FEC railroad) and preliminary station locations. However, the PD&E study is currently on hold until negotiations with FEC Railway for securing track access are complete along with identifying funding sources for operations and maintenance. This project would be the southernmost part of the planned Tri -Rail Coastal Link commuter service. The proposed stations that are the basis of the population, employment and ridership projections shown here are: *Aventura ♦ NE 79 St./EI Portal ♦ Wynwood/Edgewater ♦ North Miami Beach ♦ Midtown/Design ♦ Downtown Miami ♦ North Miami District PREFERRED TECHNOLOGY WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? muter Rail (e.g. Tri -Rail) often runs on rail lines also used by freight and long distance enger service (CSX, FEC). Compared to Heavy Rail (eg. Metrorail) it involves longer ce lines and less frequent service. It moves passengers between communities rather within them. The series of Charrettes identified the below three types of Urban Centers suitable for development around the proposed stations: Metropolitan ®, WE fek -3• Downtown' Micl riven Desi n `fo o.r h Mia►iii, ci r Fr¢ 1 .. y ic, I .`1 MiamiCentral 'District' ' at NE 125 Street`'" Station 4 City of North 4 EI Portal/ Miami Beach at City of Miami at NE 163 Street NE 79 Street 4 City of Aventura at NE 197 Street 613 C,r� 9FPLO 5.'J� AjyV City of Sunny Isles Beach 18070 Collins Avenue Sunny Isles Beach, Florida 33160 (305) 947-0606 City Hall (305) 949-3113 Fax MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners VIA: Stan Morris, City Manager FROM: Susan Simpson, Assistant City Manager DATE: November 21, 2024 RE: Expressing Support of a Collaborative Initiative Requesting a Traffic Study by Miami -Dade County and the Florida Department of Transportation of Intersection at 163rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this Resolution. REASONS: The intersection located at 163rd Street and Biscayne Boulevard is a critical corridor providing access from 1-95 to the City of Sunny Isles Beach, North Miami Beach, Golden Beach, Aventura, Bal Harbour, and unincorporated areas of Miami -Dade County. This intersection is experiencing increasing traffic congestion due to regional developments and increased railway activity associated with the Northeast Corridor project, including the forthcoming train station at N E 151St Street. This congestion negatively impacts commerce, safety, environmental quality, and emergency response times within the City of Sunny Isles Beach and neighboring communities. This resolution expresses the for the collaborative initiative between the City and surrounding municipalities to request that MDC and FDOT prioritize a study addressing traffic congestion at the intersection. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Item Number: 9.V 606 Draft Communication Northeast Corridor Smart Plan Fact Sheet Item Number: 9.V 607