Laserfiche WebLink
STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. 3/2013) PAGE 3 <br />F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT <br />(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, If not specified. Complete one Section F for each project.) <br />20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY <br />NUMBER <br /> <br />1 <br />21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) University of Tennessee Pedestrian Bridge <br />Knoxville,Tennessee <br />22. YEAR COMPLETED <br />PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2015 CONSTRUCTION (if Applicable) n/a <br />23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION <br />a. PROJECT OWNER <br />City of Knoxville <br />b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME <br />Dawn Michelle Foster <br />c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER <br />862.215.2543 <br /> <br />24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) <br />Hardesty & Hanover performed the preliminary and final bridge design of a bicycle / pedestrian crossing the Tennessee River. <br />Many significant challenges were meet during this design project: <br />• Accommodated a large 50-foot vertical gap at the north landing (University of <br />Tennessee campus) and the south landing (South Waterfront Redevelopment <br />Area) <br />• Addressed multiple overhead and underground utilities. <br />• Minimized property acquisitions <br />• Provided required clearances: Tennessee River Barge Channel, Neyland Drive <br />and Gulf & Ohio Railroad. <br />• Addressed environmental concerns and permitting requirements (permits required <br />from the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and the <br />Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)). <br /> <br />To meet the geometric considerations, the river crossing was approximately 1,000-foot-long with a 450-foot main span, minimum. A <br />graceful concrete arch bridge contained a 710-foot main span and multiple side spans approximately 130-foot in length. <br /> <br />The aesthetic quality of the bridge complements that of the <br />nearby Henley Street and Gay Street Bridges. <br />Constructability and addressing the wind and vibration <br />needs were important design factors. <br />25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT <br />a. (1) FIRM NAME <br />HARDESTY & HANOVER <br />(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) <br />New York, NY <br />(3) ROLE <br />Bridge Design Engineer <br />b. (1) FIRM NAME <br /> <br />(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) <br /> <br /> <br />(3) ROLE <br /> <br /> <br />c. (1) FIRM NAME <br /> <br />(2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) <br /> <br /> <br />(3) ROLE <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Relevancy to this Project: <br />Pedestrian Bridge Design <br />Iconic Design Features <br />Park Elements <br />Engineer of Record <br />Aesthetically Pleasing <br />Urban Environment