Laserfiche WebLink
: PEDELTA <br />MAINTENANCE, ACCESSIBILITY, AND SECURITY <br />Lifecycle Cost Comparison Stainless Steel vs Carbon Steel <br />One of the key points to consider when evaluating between the Carbon and Stainless Steel option from an <br />investment perspective, is to look at the lifecycle costs which includes all anticipated maintenance costs. The <br />maintenance requirements for Stainless Steel structures is limited to regular pressure washing with water to <br />clean the structure from marine air -salt accumulation as the duplex Stainless Steel grades proposed for this <br />project ensures a high corrosion resistance. In addition, Stainless Steel is particularly beneficial for structures <br />with significant maintenance constraints such as bridges over heavily traveled roadways and railways as it will <br />eliminate the need of major associated costs (workers protection, traffic closures and detours, etc.) and <br />indirect cost caused to the users during repair proceedings. <br />On the other hand, Carbon Steel structures face significantly higher maintenance costs as follows: <br />• Regular moderate maintenance required to re -paint corrosion spots every few years. <br />• 3-4 major bridge repainting operations are usually expected during the design lifespan of the bridges <br />(75 years). <br />• The major repainting operations will require the removal of base painting and blast cleaning of rust <br />immediately prior to paint application. <br />• Repainting will be done at short nighttime possessions to avoid interference with Collins Avenue <br />traffic. <br />• Blast cleaning is a hazardous operation. All works shall be conducted to comply with applicable <br />insurance underwriting, and safety and environmental requirements. Repainting will likely require <br />fully contained environment to capture all debris for safe and health removal and workers protection <br />over Collins Avenue. <br />• Major maintenance operations will require engineering services for the repairing project, contract <br />administration services, permit fees, inspection, and quality control. <br />• Indirect cost for both the Owner (communication requirement related to detours or potential <br />roadway impacts) and the end-users (inconvenience of closed bridges/detours). <br />Accessibility <br />The alignment and elevation of the path provides the necessary clearances and slopes to ensure universal <br />access. Railings provide safety and comfort to both pedestrians and cyclists. All components of the project <br />comply with the most stringent accessibility guidelines, including the American with Disabilities Act ADA and <br />FDOT standards for path design. <br />This crossing should be a showcase for universal access - consequently our design approach is to provide a <br />path of travel and access that is convenient and comfortable for everyone in society to use, including the <br />elderly, people with disabilities (on foot and using mobility devices), young children, parents with strollers, <br />cyclists, skaters, skateboarders etc. For this reason, we include stair access and panoramic elevators both sides <br />so as to maintain open sight lines and a clear reading of the Samson Ocean Park as an open, flat plane. <br />Railings on the bridge are 8 ft high and 42 -in on stairs and amphitheater. Handrails are provided on all railings <br />for the comfort and convenience of pedestrians. <br />All access will meet current accessibility standards (ADA) and have been designed to reflect Crime Prevention <br />Through Environmental Design ("CPTED") principles (further detail provided below). <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach <br />Request for Qualifications No. 20-10-01 <br />-20- <br />