My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2021-3170
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2021
>
Reso 2021-3170
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2021 12:52:04 PM
Creation date
3/3/2021 4:15:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2021-3170
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/18/2021
Description
Adopting the Town Center North Public Engagement Report Prepared by Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Destination: The TCNO is an important, multifunctional activity center for locals and visitors. People would <br />like to see more and higher quality shopping and dining options, as well as new entertainment and civic <br />uses added. <br />(W Livable: This quality is better described through other terms and attributes: <br />• Human scaled: an area of predominantly low and midrise buildings (as it is today) and designed to <br />engage and nurture the pedestrian at the street level, <br />• Multimodal: a walkable, bikeable, "transiteable" area. <br />• Accessible: an area easily and safely connected to other parts of the City. <br />• Open: an area with more green spaces and an improved tree canopy <br />• Updated: modernized architecture, improved public realm and upgraded selection of businesses. <br />6. Summary of Strategy Options <br />The TCNO Re -envisioning process inspired outcomes that have been useful in identifying and framing <br />alternative policy and regulatory paths. Weighing the public input and the elements of the vision, the project <br />team has compiled four (4) strategy concepts and provided a neutral basis for evaluating advantages and <br />disadvantages of each, considering certain factors. The choices, summarized on the following pages, are <br />color -coded for clarity and ease of differentiation. <br />These options are riot the entire universe of potential solutions. They are a small array distilled from the <br />common -ground ideas that emerged from the community engagement process and considered for their <br />viability, <br />TeflMSI0NIN6THE TOWN CENTER NORTH OV61U1Y <br />L,F111111111111!�W <br />UNDERSTANDING THE TCNO <br />Nit is curer* here? <br />-edominance of single -use buildings (Le,, eitheA <br />d a few public facilities located at the edges (fire <br />Ind, though technically just outside tate district, G <br />ment pattern is generally medium to lower densl <br />;ornmerclal areas where a signfticant share df the <br />.a parking. Do you think this is a well-balanced r <br />t Post -It Note and place It below. <br />I ah <br />0 <br />OM-0J <br />rsnitmamlly <br />sidentlal ipus <br />_on,Mnit-p <br />(mate parking <br />tint Use off Lad <br />i tpr Blrrut Tri611151oaoas•COMC �. ..... .._ <br />The four choices are based on public input collected through the process <br />re -Envisioning the Town Center North Overlay 112128/2020 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.