My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SRS Engineering, Inc.
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(14-07-02) Continuing Professional Architectural and Engineering Services - Individulas Only CCNA
>
Responses
>
SRS Engineering, Inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2015 12:03:41 PM
Creation date
8/18/2014 4:49:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Continuing Professional Services for Architectural, Landsc.
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
14-07-02
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RFQ No. 2012 -10 Continuing Contract for Professional Services <br />6.3 REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE <br />It is the responsibility of the contractor /vendor to provide a minimum of five (5) government agency references other <br />than North Miami Beach using this form and providing this information with your submission. Failure to do so may <br />result in the rejection of your submission. <br />Giving reference for: <br />SRS Engineering, Inc. <br />Firm giving Reference: A41 fe w e 06 ,46 W? ko, ~ F <br />Address: 30 1 5 323 sl" 1 lw .r' Ft 3314 4 <br />Phone: 416- z68 s— zd7. <br />Fax: 7ti -260 5'1l 7 <br />Email: <br />1. Q: What was the tide of the contract or job assigned to Bidder? <br />A: mOttlA 5 6 P.: f s f. d«,T , vkyroee s <br />2. Q: What was the scope or work/services assigned to Bidder? <br />A: 6;w; ,n ie o4j Jtt,Yn 4 kd ��v�krsrr.�r a/ crrvcl..�luu alp rvxv, -�5 fsi Jlu��' <br />3. Q: What was the dollar value of the contract? <br />A: $ 5107 0 ✓g. <br />4. Q:Have there been any change orders, and if so how many? <br />A: 'kip C-Ar 74 o4en <br />5. Q: Do they perform on a timely basis as required by the agreement? <br />A: yap, / 7 d� <br />6. Q: Was the project manager easy to get in contact with? <br />A: yet, /e Wh. <br />7. Q: Would you use them again? <br />A: <br />8. Q: Overall, what would you rate their performance? (Scale from 1 -5) <br />A: 95 Excellent 04 Good ❑3 Fair ❑ 2 Poor ❑l Unacceptable <br />9. Q: Is there anything else we should know, that we have not asked? <br />A: "a <br />The undersigned d s hereby certify that the foregoing and subsequent statements are true and correct and are made <br />independently, free om vendor interference /collusion. / <br />Name: � Title 7'rnl�SSr✓xre�' C.pa, nee, <br />Print Name: A4, rt1a, V Date: <br />1 01 <br />Page 40 of 69 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.