My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CES Consultants, Inc.
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(14-07-02) Continuing Professional Architectural and Engineering Services - Individulas Only CCNA
>
Responses
>
CES Consultants, Inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2015 11:26:22 AM
Creation date
8/19/2014 11:26:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Continuing Professional Services for Architectural, Landsc.
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
14-07-02
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
herein. Our core staff and technical experts <br />will make additional site visits to further <br />define /review potential alignments and <br />conflicts relative to existing utilities, traffic, <br />proximity to sensitive areas, etc. <br />Coordination with Proposed <br />Developments <br />We will coordinate with private and <br />public utility owners in the area to define <br />development plans and potential conflicts. <br />Identify Regulatory and Permitting <br />Requirements <br />CES has extensive experience with South <br />Florida local and federal agencies in <br />the permitting of various project sizes. <br />Throughout these years, CES's team <br />members have developed strong <br />professional relationships with these <br />agencies. Through field reconnaissance <br />and knowledge gained on previous pipeline <br />projects, we will prepare a preliminary <br />assessment of regulatory/permitting <br />issues affecting design and construction <br />of the pipeline. Incorporating permitting <br />and environmental concerns (including <br />wetlands, sensitive upland species, traffic, <br />dust, noise, and utility conflicts), into the <br />alternatives development and evaluation <br />will help identify the alignment locations <br />that offer the best balance in engineering <br />feasibility, permitability, public acceptance, <br />and cost. The CES Team will initiate contact <br />with regulatory and municipal agencies <br />early in the process, as numerous permits <br />will likely be necessary for this project. The <br />Team's focus in this task will be to develop <br />alternatives that minimize impacts to <br />sensitive natural and community resources. <br />This will facilitate approvals and regulatory <br />agency permitting, reduce mitigation <br />requirements, and decrease public <br />controversy. <br />We expect some route or location options <br />will require a permit with federal or state <br />agencies. Any possible canal crossings <br />will be addressed with the SFWMD at the <br />earliest project stages. The SFWMD will be <br />kept informed of the project route options <br />crossing its facilities in order to expedite <br />their permit approval. <br />Since the probable earthwork area could <br />be more than 1 acre, the project may <br />require the application to the FDEP for the <br />Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge, <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach 45 <br />Continuing Professional Services for Engineenng <br />.RFa No. 14-07-02 <br />Augusi 12, 2014 <br />including the preparation of Stormwater <br />Management Pollution Prevention Plan for <br />the construction stage. <br />Establish Design Criteria /Evaluate <br />Materials <br />We will prepare a summary of relevant <br />technical criteria for the design and <br />materials selection. Through material <br />evaluations for many large diameter <br />pipeline projects, the CES Team has <br />developed a strong technical knowledge <br />of the advantages and disadvantages of <br />varying pipeline materials. Our experience <br />with pipeline projects has fostered an <br />understanding of the key elements in <br />selecting the best pipeline material and <br />encouraging competition for cost benefits. <br />We have developed a list of the 18 most <br />important criterions in making a decision on <br />pipeline material as shown below. <br />These criterions will be used to ensure that <br />the best pipeline material is selected for the <br />project. <br />• Joint Flexibility <br />• Laying Length <br />• Weight Per Length <br />• Joint Restraint <br />• Cathodic Protection <br />• Pipe Lining <br />• Roughness Coefficient <br />• Anticipated Pressure <br />• Pressure Class <br />• Available Manufacturers <br />CR-S <br />0 s. INC, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.