|
RFQ # 26-07-01 CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES (CCNA)
<br />DISCIPLINE CATEGORY #4. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS
<br />53
<br />ELECTRICAL AND TECHNOLOGY REVIEW CHECKS
<br />27. Existing and new load, service capacity, voltage drop, short-circuit, coordination/selective coordination,
<br />arc-flash, grounding, and code calculations as applicable.
<br />28. One-line diagrams, panel schedules, equipment ratings, generator/ATS operation, emergency/life-
<br />safety separation, and utility interfaces.
<br />29. Lighting levels, controls, photometrics, energy-code compliance, pole/foundation coordination, and
<br />maintainability for street, site, and sports-field lighting.
<br />30. Fire alarm, IT/fiber, telecom pathways, access control, CCTV, security, and AV power/data/interface
<br />requirements coordinated with City platforms.
<br />31. Drawing, specification, bid-form, equipment-tag, quantity, phasing, and demolition/new-work
<br />consistency.
<br />32. Permit/AHJ requirements, accessibility and public-safety impacts, temporary power, shutdown
<br />sequencing, commissioning/testing, and record-document requirements.
<br />All review comments are recorded in a comment-resolution matrix with an owner, due date, disposition,
<br />and verification. A comment is not closed merely because text was added; the reviewer verifies the
<br />correction in the revised deliverable.
<br />4.9 Complaint Handling and City Project Manager Notification
<br />SGM defines a complaint broadly: any concern regarding responsiveness, staff conduct, design quality,
<br />safety, security, public or facility impacts, schedule, cost, construction administration, or failure to meet
<br />an agreed expectation. Complaints may arrive by phone, email, meeting, field observation, contractor,
<br />stakeholder, or City staff. Every complaint is documented and brought to the City's Project Manager;
<br />none remains only at the technical-team level.
<br />33. Receive and acknowledge. The recipient acknowledges the concern respectfully, captures the facts
<br />without assigning blame, and immediately forwards it to Justin Mundell. If the complaint concerns Justin,
<br />it goes directly to Bobby Shahnami with the City's Project Manager copied/notified.
<br />34.og and classify. SGM opens an item in the complaint/issue log with the task order, date/time, source,
<br />description, location, potential impact, severity, action owner, and required notification/closure dates.
<br />35. Protect people and operations. For a potential safety, security, outage, code, environmental, or critical
<br />public-impact issue, SGM takes authorized immediate containment action and notifies the City's Project
<br />Manager at once. SGM does not make unauthorized commitments to third parties.
<br />Review Gate Primary Review Focus Release Criterion Completion
<br />90%Constructability, maintainability, phasing and outages, specifications, bid quantities, permit readiness, commissioning requirements, detailed cost, schedule, and independent QA/QC.
<br />Bid-ready package; QA/QC and City comments assigned and resolved.
<br />2021 planned / 2021 actual
<br />100%Final comment closure; consistency among calculations, drawings, schedules, and specifications; signatures and seals; permit and bid completeness; commissioning requirements; and digital deliverables.
<br />Signed QA/QC release and Engineer of Record authorization; no unresolved critical comments.
|