My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SRS Engineering, Inc. Bid Document (4)
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(26-07-01) Continuing Professional Architectural & Engineering Consulting Services (CCNA)
>
PROPOSALS
>
SRS Engineering, Inc
>
SRS Engineering, Inc. Bid Document (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2026 1:55:30 PM
Creation date
8/31/2026 1:54:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. APPROACH/METHODOLOGY <br />62SRS Engineering, Inc.• RFQ No. 26-07-01 <br />4. APPROACH/METHODOLOGY _______________ <br />VALUE ENGINEERING EXAMPLES: <br /> MIAMI-DADE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT, <br />FEASIBILITY STUDIES FOR PUMP STATIONS 315, 20, 33, 34, <br />38 AND 41: The original scope was to find feasible relocation <br />sites for each station. SRS instead redesigned the systems <br />and eliminated three of the pump stations entirely, producing <br />significant capital and long-term operating savings for WASD <br />without reducing service (2022). <br /> CITY OF HIALEAH, E 10TH–12TH AVENUE: Early <br />contamination assessment and DERM pre-approval avoided <br />redesign and re-permitting costs during full design (2025). <br /> CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN: <br />Dividing a citywide program into 12 prioritized subarea plans <br />against an identified approximately $46.8M of improvements <br />let the City sequence work to available funding rather than <br />committing to a single large capital event. <br />QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE <br />Quality control is built into the project workflow rather than treated as a final check. SRS assigns a technical <br />reviewer who was not the primary preparer of the deliverable to review calculations, plans, specifications, <br />permitting documents and construction phase recommendations. QA/QC reviews evaluate technical accuracy, <br />constructability, completeness, consistency between disciplines, compliance with City requirements, and <br />conformance with applicable codes and standards. Mr. Serralta provides the final quality-assurance review on <br />every deliverable requiring a professional seal. <br /> Confirm scope and design criteria at project kickoff. <br /> Use discipline-specific checklists for design, drainage, utility, roadway, site/civil, survey and construction <br />phase reviews. <br /> Perform senior technical review before every major submittal to the City or a permitting agency. <br /> Coordinate interdisciplinary reviews so civil, survey, structural, MEP, traffic, landscape, geotechnical and <br />environmental information is consistent, using common base files, benchmarks, utility data, right-of-way <br />data and permit assumptions. <br /> Maintain comment response logs documenting how City and agency comments were resolved. <br /> Review opinions of probable construction cost at each design milestone. <br />TIMELY REPORTING AND COMMUNICATION <br />SRS provides concise progress updates at an interval appropriate to each task. For active design assignments, <br />updates include percent complete, work performed, outstanding information needs, upcoming deliverables, <br />schedule risks, permit status and decisions required from the City. For construction phase assignments, updates <br />include field observations, RFIs, submittals, pay applications, change order issues, testing status, nonconforming <br />work and closeout items.We see the big p ic t u r e We kno <br />w t <br />h <br />e <br /> <br />p <br />r <br />ocess We are creative We get the job doneOUR PHILOSOPHYOUR PHILOSOPHY
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.