Laserfiche WebLink
,a e <br /> • <br /> corridors to public beaches" as set forth in Objective <br /> 1G; <br /> • The Land Development Regulations improperly attempt to <br /> vest rights in proposed developments which are <br /> completely incompatible with the as-built character of <br /> Golden Beach, and thus inconsistent "with the character <br /> of the surrounding community" and inconsistent with <br /> Objective 4; <br /> • By allowing developers to purchase additional floor area <br /> ratio, as opposed to requiring on-site mitigation or <br /> linking the bonuses to on-site features, the Land <br /> Development Regulations violate Objectives 10A, 10E, and <br /> 14 ; <br /> • By approving Land Development Regulations which seek to <br /> vest development rights for a series of high-density <br /> projects which . were illegally approved, the combined <br /> effect of which will generate traffic that will cause <br /> the appropriate levels of service to be degraded, the <br /> Land Development Regulations contravene both the Capital <br /> Improvements Element and the Transportation Element of <br /> the Comprehensive Plan. With specific reference to this <br /> traffic' s impact on hurricane evacuation, the Land <br /> Development Regulations are inconsistent with Objective <br /> 12 of the Transportation Element and Objective 6 and <br /> Policies 6A through 6G of the Coastal Element . <br /> 11 . In addition to the foregoing, the "land development <br /> reaulation (s) " , particularly through their bonus provisions, <br /> effectively "subsidize development in high-hazard coastal areas" <br /> and thus contravene both the spirit and intent of Fla. Stat . <br /> §163 . 3177 (6) (g) (7) . <br /> 12 . The petitioners specifically reserve their rights as <br /> to other actions available to them, pending and proposed, and to <br /> amend this petition if and when it petitions the state land <br /> planning agency for the relief sought herein. <br /> SHUBIN & BASS, P.A. <br /> 5 <br />