My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2016-480
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
2016
>
Ordinance 2016-480
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2017 3:06:18 PM
Creation date
5/27/2016 2:48:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2016-480
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
05/19/2016
Description
Ord Adopting EAR-Based Textural Amendments to Comp Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. Survey <br /> In addition to the public involvement process, the City also conducted a 20 question <br /> written and online survey. The survey was presented in Russian and Spanish as well as <br /> English in order to accommodate the City's diverse population and maximize <br /> participation. The City received a total of 480 responses to this survey between July 10 <br /> and October 9, 2015. The survey results are included as Appendix C. <br /> The survey response was diverse, with approximately 20% of responded between the <br /> ages of 18-40, 50% between the ages of 41-65, and 30% of respondents aged over 65. <br /> The feedback from the public indicated a high concern for resolving issues related to <br /> drainage (49%), street and sidewalk improvements (47%), and crosswalk improvements <br /> (42%). Concerning street improvements, congestion was a major concern noted by over <br /> 70% of respondents, with over 20% indicating an issue with parking. At the same time, <br /> there was cognizance from the community that bicycle, pedestrian, and "Complete <br /> Streets" improvements should be a City priority. These improvements were rated to be <br /> just as important as roadway improvements, indicating community support for <br /> multimodal/alternative mode transportation. There was also a noted need for more park <br /> and open space (30%), better urban design (30%), and more landscaping (21%). <br /> Increased access to the beach, currently serviced by Beach Access paths, was also a <br /> priority noted by 28% of respondents. <br /> In addition to the questions, respondents were also provided with an opportunity to <br /> provide additional comments. These comments addressed a wide-range of issues, <br /> including: overdevelopment/building heights; congestion; traffic and transportation safety; <br /> needed infrastructure improvements; beach erosion; the maintenance of parks, beaches <br /> and public areas; public safety; homelessness; noise pollution; the need for greater retail <br /> variety; the need for additional recreational and library programming; the need for a senior <br /> center/additional programming for seniors; the provision of free public Wi-Fi in all areas, <br /> and; the need for a high school. <br /> 05:Which of the following do you use to commute to work, <br /> shopping,or school(Please check all that apply) <br /> Am.reted:386 'caed:8' --- —'- — ---- ---- <br /> We.u..'. 3515% <br /> R tULd Str<ct 61M% <br /> t <br /> •du.n 1&t71' <br /> gym' tt6t1 <br /> lrwp.'tMim <br /> =>d..�. I <br /> Ggdc 1161% <br /> ^tt <br /> c : J 1363% <br /> roc. <br /> 1 <br /> Flv at'l= 1111 x <br /> n ble �.cM <br /> Above graphic—sample survey results <br /> 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.