My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2000-259
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2000
>
Reso 2000-259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2013 3:37:57 PM
Creation date
1/25/2006 1:56:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2000-259
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
07/20/2000
Description
Tischler & Assoc., Impact Fee Ord., Special Assessment Study.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />B. Review Cost Estimates. In this subtask we will review, as relevant, the various <br />capital costs for public facilities. As part of this subtask, we will ascertain whether the <br />facilities are likely to be bonded, and if so, the amortization schedule. <br /> <br />As part of calculating the revenue mechanism, the City may include the construction <br />contract price; the cost of acquiring land, improvements, materials and fixtures; the cost for <br />planning, surveying, and engineering fees for services provided for and directly related to <br />the construction system improvement, and debt service charges. <br /> <br />C. Evaluate Development Policy Implications of Different Allocation Methodologies. <br />As part of the interaction with the City, we will simultaneously consider different <br />possible allocation methodologies in terms of dollars being utilized for replacement costs, <br />versus capital costs being use for expansion of capacity as well as allocation of those <br />costs to different types of land uses. We will calculate the level of service and allocate <br />the future demands to new and existing needs, with the assistance of City staff. <br /> <br />Work Product: Capital Improvement Needs Accommodating New Growth <br /> <br />TASK 4. Evaluate Credits <br /> <br />Once the costs attributable to new development are ascertained, there is a need to deduct <br />appropriate credits in order to obtain the net impact fees. This task will include a review <br />of existing fees and contributions. Once the exactions, deductions and double payment <br />evaluations are complete, The next task wiII be pursued. <br /> <br />Work Product: See Impact Fee Report Below <br /> <br />TASK 5. Complete Impact Fee Methodology and Calculations <br /> <br />The completion of this and the above tasks will enable the methodology to be appropriately <br />and equitably determined and finalized. As part of the analysis, collection and expenditure <br />zones will be discussed pertaining to the rational nexus requirements. (The City wiII <br />subsequently decide what percentage of the impact fee it wants to charge.) <br /> <br />Work Product: See Impact Fee Report Below <br /> <br />TASK 6. Preparation of Impact Fee Report <br /> <br />We will prepare a draft report which summarizes the need for the impact fees .for the <br />appropriate public facility category and which provides the relevant methodology for <br />determining the fee amount. The report will include at a minimum the following <br />information: <br /> <br />. Executive Summary <br />· A detailed description of the methodologies used during the study <br />· A detailed description of all formulas used and accompanying rationale <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Tischler & Associates. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.