My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2000-259
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2000
>
Reso 2000-259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2013 3:37:57 PM
Creation date
1/25/2006 1:56:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2000-259
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
07/20/2000
Description
Tischler & Assoc., Impact Fee Ord., Special Assessment Study.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Based on a preliminaty review of the information, it is possible that the impact fees could <br />generate $75,000-$125,000 yearly, assuming about 100 new housing units. The impact <br />fee revenues would range from about $110,000 - $185,000 annually if there were about <br />150 new housing units annually. <br /> <br />The cost for the impact fees study totals $43,300. <br /> <br />II. NA TURE OF ASSIGNMENT <br /> <br />Tischler & Associates, Inc. (T A) is a fiscal, economic and planning consulting firm that <br />specializes in fiscal impact analysis, impact fees and other revenue exactions. T A has <br />prepared over 400 impact fees, none of which has been challenged. On the other hand, <br />T A has worked on behalf of the private sector to critique impact fees. In all cases, the <br />impact fees have either been eliminated or reduced. <br /> <br />III. lVIETHODOLOGIES <br /> <br />There are three usual impact fee methodologies that can be applied in the calculation of <br />impact fees. These are the plan-based, incremental and buy-in approaches. The plan- <br />based approach is usually based on a master plan or facility study that indicates the future <br />facility needs over a certain time frame to service certain population thresholds. The <br />incremental approach reflects the methodology in which capital items are added <br />incrementally to meet growth. The buy-in methodology is a third approach. This occurs <br />when the City has already oversized capital facilities from which new growth will <br />benefit. This approach can be utilized with either of the first two approaches. <br /> <br />IV. PARKS <br /> <br />The Parks category has two components, parks and equipment. These are discussed in <br />turn. <br /> <br />The City currently has five park locations. These include Gilbert Samson Memorial Park, <br />a passive park, an active park, and a tot-lot, which will be expanded. It is anticipated that <br />the expenditure of local funds (past and current) could approximate $3.5 million. <br /> <br />There is also a component for park equipment. This relates to the transit buses utilized <br />within the City. New growth should pay its fair share for the demands of these buses. <br /> <br />TA recommends that the impact fee methodology be recalibrated in order to . reflect <br />updated information pertaining to methodologies, levels of service, costs and other <br />factors. The expansion of these parks will benefit both new and existing residents. <br />Accordingly new growth will pay its fair share of the capital assets from which it <br />benefits. The methodologies are likely to include both the buy-in as well as plan-based <br />approaches. It is likely that the plan-based approach would reflect improvements to parks <br />over a six-year span. During this time the City would be able to utilize funding, other <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Tischler & Associates. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.