My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2000-259
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2000
>
Reso 2000-259
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2013 3:37:57 PM
Creation date
1/25/2006 1:56:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2000-259
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
07/20/2000
Description
Tischler & Assoc., Impact Fee Ord., Special Assessment Study.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />than impact fees, to pay for the increase in park plan assets benefiting the eXlstmg <br />residents. For transit buses, the methodology would be either incremental or buy in. <br /> <br />V. POLICE <br /> <br />The major police asset is equipment. The City currently has twenty-five vehicles, four <br />motorcycles, two boats and other equipment. As development continues, there will be an <br />increase cost for service and an increase for police personnel. This will have a resulting <br />impact of creating additional demand for police vehicles. <br /> <br />A building component is normally reflected in a police impact fee. At the present time the <br />City leases this space. However this will be changing with the construction of the police <br />facilities in the City's new Municipal Facility. <br /> <br />T A recommends that the impact fee the City collects for Police be recalibrated. This is <br />due to changes in methodology, levels of service, cost assumptions and other factors. <br /> <br />The methodology for the police equipment is likely to be the incremental approach. The <br />methodology for the police station area is likely to be a plan-based approach in which <br />new growth would pay its fair share of the City's additional space devoted to police <br />services. The demand for police services will be allocated on a residential and a non- <br />residential basis. <br /> <br />VI. CITY FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT <br /> <br />The major city facility is the space leased for the use of City offices. However this <br />situation will be changing with the planned construction of a new City Hall. The new <br />City Hall will relieve the overcrowded condition of the current City activities and also be <br />able to accommodate the demands due to new development. New growth should pay its <br />fair share of this level of service, which will be reflected with the opening of a new City <br />Hall. <br /> <br />Another component of the City facilities and equipment fee is the inclusion of relevant <br />City equipment. This will include the various trucks and other equipment. <br /> <br />The methodology for the City Hall will be a plan-based approach in which the level of <br />service will be increased to reflect the opening of the new City Hall. New growth will <br />pay its proportional share. The methodology for the equipment will be on an incremental <br />basis. <br /> <br />VII. TRANSPORT A TION/ TRAFFIC <br /> <br />The major roads utilized within the City were built by other entities, primarily the state. <br />The other streets were built by developers, since they were part of new subdivisions. <br />Since the City has not expended local dollars for the current street infrastructure, impact <br />fees would not be appropriate. <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Tischler & Associates. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.