My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2001-343
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2001
>
Reso 2001-343
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2013 10:43:22 AM
Creation date
1/25/2006 1:56:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2001-343
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
07/12/2001
Description
– Adopting Manual & Report on Impact Fees.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />((;tE~~ \:\,;~:;A~~T F :~[S <br /> <br />An incremental expansion cost method is best suited for public facilities that will be <br />expanded in regular increments, with standards based on current conditions in the <br />community. Impact fees for police and municipal facilities include an incremental expansion <br />component for vehicles and equipment. This method documents the current LOS in both <br />quantitative and qualitative measures. <br /> <br />A third method, known as the buy-in approach, has not been used to derive impact fees for <br />the City of Sunny Isles Beach. The rationale for the buy-in approach is that new <br />development should pay for its share of the useful life and remaining capacity of existing <br />facilities that were oversized for future growth. <br /> <br />Figure 2 summarizes the methods used to derive the impact fee for each type of public <br />facility. Also shown is a rank-ordered list of capital items according to their relative <br />contribution to each type of public facility. For example, the impact fee for police is based <br />on two cost components. The major capital cost is a plan-based component for the new <br />police headquarters, followed by the cost of rolling stock, such as patrol cars. <br /> <br />Figure 2 _ Impact Fee Methods and Cost Components <br /> <br /> <br />Citywide Parks 3) Rolling Stock 1} Park Improvements Not applicable in <br />& Recreation 2} Beach Access & Sunny Isles Beach <br /> Improvements <br />police Facilities 2} Rolling Stock 1} Headquarters Not applicable in <br /> Sunny Isles Beach <br />Municipal Facilities Not applicable in 1} City Hall Not applicable in <br /> Sunny Isles Beach 2} Rolling Stock Sunny Isles Beach <br /> <br />Another general requirement that is common to impact fee methodologies is the evaluation <br />of credits. There are several types of credits that have been considered. First, a future <br />revenue credit has been evaluated to avoid potential double payment for capital facilities <br />through on-going revenues that may fund system improvements. For example, this type of <br />potential double payment may occur if facilities are bond financed. <br /> <br />The second type of credit is a site-specific credit for system improvements that have been <br />included in the impact fee calculations. policies and procedures related to site-specific <br />credits for system improvements will be addressed in the ordinance that establishes the <br />City's fees. However, the general concept is that developers may be eligible for site-specific <br />credits or reimbursements only if they provide system improvements that have been <br />included in the impact fee calculations. Project improvements normally required as part of <br />the development approval process are not eligible for credits against impact fees. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Tischler & Associates, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.