My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2003-520
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2003
>
Reso 2003-520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2010 9:41:00 AM
Creation date
1/25/2006 1:57:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2003-520
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/20/2003
Description
– Interlocal Agmt for Public School Facility Planning.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />c. Compatibility of land uses adjacent to existing schools and <br />reserved or proposed school sites; <br /> <br />d. The potential for collocation of parks, recreation and <br />neighborhood facilities with school sites; <br /> <br />e. The potential for linkage of schools, parks, libraries and <br />other public facilities with bikeways, trails, and sidewalks for <br />safe access; <br /> <br />f, Traffic circulation plans that serve schools and the <br />surrounding neighborhood, including off-site signalization, <br />signage, and access improvements; <br /> <br />g. The general location of public schools proposed in the <br />five-year work plan as well as other available information <br />over a ten and 20-year time frame. <br /> <br />7.7 In formulating community development plans and programs, the <br />County and Cities should consider the following issues: <br /> <br />a. Giving priority to scheduling capital improvements that are <br />coordinated with and meet the capital needs identified in the <br />School Board District Educational Facilities Plan; <br /> <br />b. Providing incentives that promote collaborative efforts <br />between the School Board and the private sector to develop <br />adequate school facilities in residential developments; <br /> <br />c. Targeting community development improvements in older <br />and distressed neighborhoods near existing or proposed <br />School Board owned and operated public schools and <br />School Board approved charter schools; and <br /> <br />d. Coordination with neighboring jurisdictions to address <br />public school issues of mutual concern, <br /> <br />e. Approval and funding of community development benefit <br />districts (COD'S) and other available funding <br />mechanisms created by state law. <br /> <br />Section 8. Collocation and Shared Use <br /> <br />8.1 Collocation and shared use of facilities are important to both the <br />School Board and local governments. The School Board and Cities and <br />County will work together, via the staff working group and the SSPCC, to <br />look for opportunities to collocate and share use of school facilities and <br />civic facilities when preparing the District Educational Facilities Plan. <br />Likewise, collocation and shared use opportunities will be considered by <br />the local governments when preparing the annual update to the <br /> <br />Page 11 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.