My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2003-520
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2003
>
Reso 2003-520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2010 9:41:00 AM
Creation date
1/25/2006 1:57:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2003-520
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/20/2003
Description
– Interlocal Agmt for Public School Facility Planning.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />development at the time of impact, the School Board will determine and <br />specify the options available to it to meet the anticipated student <br />enrollment demand. Alternatively, the School Board, local government, <br />and developer will use their best efforts to collaboratively develop options <br />that aim to provide the capacity to accommodate new students generated <br />from the new residential development. The School Board shall be <br />responsible to review and consider funding options for the incremental <br />increase in the projected number of students which include, but are not <br />limited to, creation of new community development districts pursuant to <br />Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, creation of educational facilities benefit <br />districts as described in Section 1013.355, Florida Statutes, other <br />available broad-based funding mechanisms to fund school capital <br />construction, developer contributions in the form of land donation set <br />asides, monetary contributions, or developer provided facility <br />improvements in lieu of impact fees and other School Board approved <br />measures such as public charter schools, public-private partnerships, or a <br />combination of any of these. In its analysis of need, School Board staff <br />shall also include information on the estimated educational facilities impact <br />fee revenues to be generated by the development, as well as on any other <br />available funding for capital projects specifically intended to mitigate the <br />area of impact. <br /> <br />This Section shall not be construed to obligate a City to impose, assess or <br />collect a school impact fee, unless provided by general law. As it relates <br />to the collection of impact fees, this provision shall not be subject to <br />dispute resolution under Section 9 of this Agreement. <br /> <br />This Section shall not be construed to obligate a City or County to deny a <br />development should the School Board fail to identify options to meet <br />anticipated demand or should the collaborative process described in this <br />Section fail to yield a means to ensure sufficient capacity. <br /> <br />7.6 In the review and consideration of comprehensive plan amendments, <br />rezonings, and development proposals, and their respective potential <br />school impacts, the County and Cities should consider the following <br />issues: <br /> <br />a. School Board comments, which may include available <br />school capacity or planned improvements to increase school <br />capacity, including School Board approved charter schools <br />and operational constraints (e.g., establishment of or <br />modifications to attendance boundaries and controlled <br />choice zones), if any, that may impact school capacity within <br />an area, including public-private partnerships; <br /> <br />b. The provision of school sites and facilities within planned <br />neighborhoods; <br /> <br />Page 10 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.