My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2010-1529
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2010
>
Reso 2010-1529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2012 11:44:38 AM
Creation date
2/26/2010 10:54:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2010-1529
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/18/2010
Description
Health Insurance Renewal Agmts w/AvMed, Lincoln Financial Group & EyeMed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> <br />13.03.01 The benefits of a policy or plan that covers the person as an ernployee, member, or <br />subscriber, other than as a dependent, are determined before those of the policy or plan <br />which covers the person as a dependent. <br /> <br />13.03.02 Except as stated in Subsection 13.03.03, when 2 or more policies or plans cover the same <br />child as a dependent of different parents: <br /> <br />a) The benefits of the policy or plan of the parent whose birthday, excluding year of birth, <br />falls earlier in a year are determined before the benefits of the policy or plan of the <br />parent whose birthday, excluding year of birth, falls later in the year; but <br /> <br />b) If both parents have the same birthday, the benefits of the policy or plan which covered <br />the parent for a longer period oftirne are determined before those of the policy or plan <br />which covered the parent for a shorter period of time. <br /> <br />c) However, if a policy or plan subject to the rule based on the birthday of the parents as <br />stated above coordinates with an out-of-state policy or plan which contains provisions <br />under which the benefits of a policy or plan which covers a person as a dependent of a <br />male are determined before those of a policy or plan which covers the person as a <br />dependent of a female and if, as a result, the policies or plans do not agree on the order <br />of benefits, the provisions of the other policy or plan shall determine the order of <br />benefits. <br /> <br />13.03.03 If 2 or more policies or plans cover a dependent child of divorced or separated parents, <br />benefits for the child are determined in this order: <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />-J <br /> <br />a) First, the policy or plan of the parent with custody of the child; <br /> <br />b) Second, the policy or plan of the spouse of the parent with custody of the child; and <br /> <br />c) Third, the policy or plan of the parent not having custody of the child. <br /> <br />d) However, if the specific terms of a court order state that one of the parents is <br />responsible for the health care expenses of the child and if the entity obliged to payor <br />provide the benefits of the policy or plan of that parent has actual knowledge of those <br />terms, the benefits of that policy or plan are determined first. This does not apply with <br />respect to any claim determination period or plan or policy year during which any <br />benefits are actually paid or provided before that entity has that actual knowledge. <br /> <br />13.03.04 The benefits of a policy or plan which covers a person as an employee who is neither laid off <br />nor retired, or as that employee's dependent, are determined before those of a policy or plan <br />which covers that person as a laid off or retired ernployee or as that employee's dependent. <br />If the other policy or plan is not subject to this rule, and if, as a result, the policies or plans <br />do not agree on the order of benefits, this Subsection shall not apply. <br /> <br />13.03.05 If none of the rules in Subsections 13.03.01, 13.03.02, 13.03.03, or 13.03.04 determine the <br />order of benefits, the benefits of the policy or plan which covered an employee, rnember, or <br />subscriber for a longer period of tirne are determined before those of the policy or plan <br />which covered that person for the shorter period of time. <br /> <br />13.03.06 Coordination of benefits shall not be permitted against an indemnity-type policy, an excess <br />insurance policy as defmed in Chapter 627.635, F/orida Statutes, a policy with coverage <br />limited to specified illnesses or accidents, or a Medicare supplement policy. However, if the <br />person is also a Medicare beneficiary, and if the rule established under the Social Security <br />Act of 1965, as amended, makes Medicare secondary to the plan covering the person as a <br />dependent of an active employee, the order of benefit determination is: <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />A V -0100-2009 <br />MP.53 19 (10/09) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.