My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2008-1301
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2008
>
Reso 2008-1301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2016 11:21:17 AM
Creation date
10/7/2008 10:10:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2008-1301
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
07/17/2008
Description
Tenex Bid & Agrmt for Atlantic Isles Roadway & Utility Improv ($2,885,048.00)
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� I <br />I b) <br />i <br />C) <br />I d) <br />e) <br />Response: FPL will be undergrounding the electrical power <br />distribution to transformer pads, followed by extension of service to <br />62 homes. Power poles and light poles must remain in service until <br />the transfer from overhead to underground can take place. All <br />existing power poles will be removed after near the completion of the <br />project. The bid item will be revised to "Remove Power /Light Poles ". <br />Item 16 of the bid form calls for the replacement of brick pavers. Can you <br />provide specs for the type of brick pavers that are required? Or do we <br />have to match the existing brick pavers? If the intention of the plans is to <br />match the existing pavers, please be advised that based on past <br />experience some of the pavers could be discontinued, and if available the <br />color will probably not match the rest of the pavers in the driveway. <br />Owners tend to be very unreasonable when the color of their pavers don't <br />match perfectly. Please advise? <br />Response: A standard apron is shown on the plans with a set <br />distance from the edge of the proposed road to the existing <br />driveways. Instructions are to saw cut the drives regardless of <br />material and match with the proposed pavement. Due to grade <br />deferential between the proposed road and the existing driveway, the <br />paver bricks must be removed and replaced after regrading the <br />driveway. In all cases, the existing pavers are to be salvaged for this <br />work and any excess shall become the property of the owner. <br />What is the estimated cost for this project? <br />Response: $1,345,000 excluding the water distribution and FPL <br />underground. <br />Can you provide boring logs for this project? The cut for gravity sewer at <br />some locations is 10 feet below existing grade. It will be very helpful to <br />know what the soil strata consists of. <br />Response: See attached Geotechnical Report in this addendum. <br />Are there any weight restrictions on the bridges? <br />Response: Yes, 2 front bridges to Collins 99 tons, no load on <br />historical bridge. <br />If unsuitable material is found at the bottom of the pipe trench, how deep <br />below the invert of the pipe will the contractor be required to excavate and <br />remove the unsuitable material? Will the additional suitable fill require for <br />backfilling above and below the pipe be paid under Item 14, Select Fill <br />Materials? <br />Response: Yes, however, the quantities removed shall be in <br />accordance with Miami -Dade WASD standards and specifications for <br />sanitary sewer; FDOT for drainage collection system; City of North <br />Miami for the water distribution system. <br />Item 12 of the bid form calls for FC 12.7 asphalt instead of SP -9.5 as <br />shown on Sheet C -18 and 19. Which is correct? <br />Response: FC 12.7. <br />What type of asphalt is required for Item No. 17? <br />Response: SP 9.5 for the Laguna only. <br />1 04/08 Final Version 00900 -2 05 -4893 <br />9) <br />t <br />h) <br />Response: FPL will be undergrounding the electrical power <br />distribution to transformer pads, followed by extension of service to <br />62 homes. Power poles and light poles must remain in service until <br />the transfer from overhead to underground can take place. All <br />existing power poles will be removed after near the completion of the <br />project. The bid item will be revised to "Remove Power /Light Poles ". <br />Item 16 of the bid form calls for the replacement of brick pavers. Can you <br />provide specs for the type of brick pavers that are required? Or do we <br />have to match the existing brick pavers? If the intention of the plans is to <br />match the existing pavers, please be advised that based on past <br />experience some of the pavers could be discontinued, and if available the <br />color will probably not match the rest of the pavers in the driveway. <br />Owners tend to be very unreasonable when the color of their pavers don't <br />match perfectly. Please advise? <br />Response: A standard apron is shown on the plans with a set <br />distance from the edge of the proposed road to the existing <br />driveways. Instructions are to saw cut the drives regardless of <br />material and match with the proposed pavement. Due to grade <br />deferential between the proposed road and the existing driveway, the <br />paver bricks must be removed and replaced after regrading the <br />driveway. In all cases, the existing pavers are to be salvaged for this <br />work and any excess shall become the property of the owner. <br />What is the estimated cost for this project? <br />Response: $1,345,000 excluding the water distribution and FPL <br />underground. <br />Can you provide boring logs for this project? The cut for gravity sewer at <br />some locations is 10 feet below existing grade. It will be very helpful to <br />know what the soil strata consists of. <br />Response: See attached Geotechnical Report in this addendum. <br />Are there any weight restrictions on the bridges? <br />Response: Yes, 2 front bridges to Collins 99 tons, no load on <br />historical bridge. <br />If unsuitable material is found at the bottom of the pipe trench, how deep <br />below the invert of the pipe will the contractor be required to excavate and <br />remove the unsuitable material? Will the additional suitable fill require for <br />backfilling above and below the pipe be paid under Item 14, Select Fill <br />Materials? <br />Response: Yes, however, the quantities removed shall be in <br />accordance with Miami -Dade WASD standards and specifications for <br />sanitary sewer; FDOT for drainage collection system; City of North <br />Miami for the water distribution system. <br />Item 12 of the bid form calls for FC 12.7 asphalt instead of SP -9.5 as <br />shown on Sheet C -18 and 19. Which is correct? <br />Response: FC 12.7. <br />What type of asphalt is required for Item No. 17? <br />Response: SP 9.5 for the Laguna only. <br />1 04/08 Final Version 00900 -2 05 -4893 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.