specifications - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

... EMERGECNCY DEBRIS DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES SCORING NARRATIVE November, 2007 La. If you feel that the firm has clearly shown that they have the necessary, pertinent, and well developed skills and knowledge to provide an excellent product, then they should be given a score of 15 to 11. If they have not adequately proven themselves, they should receive a score of 10 to 5. If they have shown no real pertinent abilities or skills, they should receive a 4 to O. The variables are how experienced they are and how competent they are in regard to this project. l.b. The object here is not to brag on how impressive the project manager is in general. Instead, if they have clearly explained in understandable terms how the project manager can bring special skills to this specific project, they should be given a score of 15 to 11. If they have not presented pertinent experience in detail (or it is not completely pertinent), or they have only partially explained how it is relevant, they should receive a score of 10 to 5. If they have given no real pertinent experience or not addressed the issues, they should receive a 4 to O. The variables are how pertinent the project manager's experience is and how it will be used. 2.a. If the firm has clearly explained, in understandable terms, their strategy to accomplish the scope of work, and you consider it highly feasible, they should be given a score of 5 or 4. If they have not clearly explained their strategy, or if you feel it is not completely realistic, they should receive a score of 3 or 2. If they have given no understandable strategy or you feel it is completely unrealistic, they should receive a 1 or O. The variables are how thorough, and how realistic. 2.b. The object here is not to simply list one issue, it is to list one significant issue that is insightful and unique to the project. If the consultant has clearly explained, in understandable terms, their one most critical issue and you consider it highly pertinent, critical, and unique, they should be given a score of 5 or 4. If they have not presented an issue that is truly unique or critical, but has some merit, they should receive a score of 3 or 2. If they have given no real insight and have presented one issue that is common and mundane, they should receive a 1 to O. The variables are how pertinent and how unique. 2.c. If the firm has clearly explained, in very understandable terms, the real world practicality of their approach, and you feel it is in fact a viable and creative approach, then they should be given a score of 5 or 4. If they have not adequately proven the feasibility, they should receive a score of 3 or 2. If they have given no real proof, or the construction would be difficult at best, they should receive a 1 or O. The variables are how competent is their design and can it be easily constructed.