My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2010-1590
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2010
>
Reso 2010-1590
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2010 9:31:17 AM
Creation date
7/22/2010 2:29:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2010-1590
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
07/15/2010
Description
Agmt w/Calvin Giordano: Permitting Issues on Emerg/Pedestrian Bridge&Fishing Pier
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />will be issued. The State has deadlines for responding to <br />applications (30 days to file a request for additional information <br />and 90 days after the application is deemed complete to issue or <br />deny a permit), but neither the Corps nor DERM have deadlines for <br />taking action. Delays are inevitable with these two agencies. <br /> <br />4. Construction plans for the proposed improvements (including <br />drainage plans and calculations) will be prepared by others. These <br />plans will be submitted to DERM to complete the Class I permit <br />application. The paving, grading and drainage plans will be <br />submitted to the SFWMD to complete the ERP application. <br /> <br />B. Miscellaneous General Consulting <br /> <br />1. This task will allow CGA and its sub-consultants to perform <br />miscellaneous assignments which may be required but do not fall <br />within the scope of the first task. It is understood that work under <br />this task will be performed only at your discretion and with your <br />authorization. Work charged under this task could include <br />additional site inspections, zoning assistance meetings with <br />agencies, litigation assistance, etc. <br /> <br />2. Basis of the Proposal <br /> <br />1. Based upon our experience with similar assignments, we believe it . <br />is best to provide our work for Task A (Environmental Permitting) <br />and Task B (Miscellaneous General Consulting) on an hourly basis <br />plus expenses, against a budget estimate. <br /> <br />2. Out of pocket expenses (reimbursable) include water quality or soil <br />testing, application and permit fees, surveys by a registered <br />surveyor, or out of pocket expenses listed in this proposal. <br /> <br />3. Regulatory agency plan review fees and permit fees are not <br />included in the budgets for any tasks. They are your responsibility. <br />Please note that the budgets for several tasks are budget estimates <br />and are not a fee maximum. Because of ever-changing regulatory <br />requirements, it is difficult to assess a budget for some tasks. <br />Hourly billing is fair for both parties. If permitting goes easily, our <br />billings will not exceed the budget amount; if permitting is <br />difficult, however, our bill for a task could exceed the budgeted <br />amount. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.