Municipal Code Corp.#1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(d) All provisions desired to be repealed should be repealed specifically by section, subdivision, division, article or chapter number, as appropriate, or by setting out the repealed provisions in full in the repealing ordinance." 1 -8 (General penalty): Was the intent of Code sections 2 -193 through 2 -195 to supersede this section, especially as to imprisonment provisions of this section? That is, was 2- 195 intended to establish every violaton of the Code as an infraction? Such sections were adopted under the authority of F.S. § 162.21, were they not? This section (1 -8) is in compliance with F.S. § 162.22, but it appears that selection of the option of F.S. § 162.21 precludes use of 162.22 [which authorizes imprisonment for up to 60 days]. Please review and advise as to any revision desired. Note that F.S. § 775.08(2) provides that the term "misdemeanor" does not include, inter alia, violations of a municipal ordinance. In addition, throughout the Code change any provision declaring an act to be a misdemeanor to provide that it shall be a "violation" of the Code? 2 -37 (Order of business): Is this the present commission order of business? 2- 80(b)(2) (Normal retirement conditions for "benefit group firefighter "): Unless this is under a former firefighter retirement system, per F.S. § 175.331, this appears to conflict with F.S. § 175.162(1) with regard to the normal retirement date for firefighters. Revise to conform to such statute? Or, leave as is? 2- 80(b)(3) (Normal retirement conditions for "benefit group police officer "): Unless this is under a separate firefighter retirement system, per F.S. § 185.35, this appears to conflict with F.S. § 185.16 with regard to the normal retirement date for firefighters. Revise to conform to such statute? Or, leave as is? I2- 84(a)(2) (Pension to eligible surviving spouse of deceased retired