Laserfiche WebLink
to disturb the" <br />3 -17 (Businesses with established location exempted): The <br />constitutionality of this is questionable on equal protection <br />grounds. Delete this section? <br />3 -23 (Placing handbills on or in automobiles prohibited): The <br />constitutionality of this is questionable in that it is arguably an <br />invalid prior restraint on speech. Perhaps, revise the first <br />sentence to add the following phrase at the end: <br />", without placing the same in such a manner as to <br />prevent the same from being blown or carried about <br />by the elements." ? <br />3 -27 (Information to be shown on handbill): A requirement that <br />handbills contain the names and addresses of the author and <br />distributor, at least as applied to noncommercial handbills, <br />is unconstitutional in light of Talley v. California 362 U.S. 60 <br />(1960). Revise this section to delete the phrase "or <br />noncommercial" in light of such case? <br />' 5 -4 (Cruelty to animals): Revise to conform to F.S. § <br />828.12(1)? <br />5 -32 (Vaccination of domesticated animals required): While <br />under F.S. § 828.30(5), municipalities are authorized to adopt <br />' more stringent vaccination requirements than are provided in <br />828.30, would the city wish to revise this section to authorize <br />exemption of certain dogs and cats as provided in 828.30(2), <br />' generally exempting aged, infirm, disabled or ill animals? <br />' 5 -51 (Redemption fees for impounded animals): Current? <br />Note that such fees have not been amended since 1987. <br />' 6 -31 <br />(One and Two Family Dwelling Code, 1982 Edition, <br />' adopted): F.S. § 553.73(2)(c), provides that the 1986 edition <br />is the required minimum edition of this Code, but provides in <br />F.S. § 553.73(3) that the state board of building codes and <br />' standards may by rule designate all or part of an updated or <br />11 <br />