Municipal Code Corp.#1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

11- 76(173) (Fee for oculist): Delete as covered by subsection (176)? 11- 76(182) (Fee for palmist): See note above as to subsection (59). Delete this in any case as covered by (59)? 11- 76(189) (Fee for phrenologist): See note above as to subsection (59). Delete this in any case as covered by (59)? 11- 76(204) (Fee for recruiting labor, $175.00 per day): Is this actually enforced? The per day charge seems to clearly be aimed at, in effect, prohibiting such activity in the city. 11- 76(223) (Shows: theatrical, vaudeville or minstrel; $1500 per day): Same comments and question as to (204). 11 -78 (Occupational license exemption for "cripples, invalids, aged, etc. "): Revise to conform to F.S. § 205.162? 11 -79 (Occupational license exemptions for disabled veterans and unremarried spouses): Revise to conform to F.S. § 205.171(1), (5) and (6)? 11 -80 (Occupational license exemption for certain agricultural products): Revise to conform to F.S. § 205.064(1), by adding the word "aquacultural" after "farm," in the first line? 11 -83 (Amateur entertainment exemption): The constitutionality of this is questionable on equal protection grounds in that it distinguishes between "local talent" and any others. Delete the phrase "where local talent is used exclusively. "? 11 -106 &11 -110 (Telephone tax): There appears to be a conflict between these two sections in that 11 -106 levies the tax that was authorized in F.S. § 166.231(9)(a)2, [now 166.231(10)(a)2] which is 7 percent of the total amount charged for any telecommunications service while 11 -110 provides that the tax applies to all charges made for local telephone service, which was the tax authorized by F.S. § 166.231(9)(a)1 [now 16623](10)(a)]]. Since 11 -106 is the most recently amended, it would appear that 11 -110 should be deleted. Do so? I1 11- 202(1) u (Definition of "secondhand dealer "): Revise to conform to 19