My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Municipal Code Corp.#1
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 01-06-01 Codification Services
>
Municipal Code Corp.#1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2012 7:27:02 AM
Creation date
12/28/2010 11:23:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Codifications
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
01-06-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F.S. § 538.03(1)(a)? <br />(Definition of "precious metal "): Revise to conform to F. S. <br />§ 538.03(1)0)? <br />11 -205 (Goods to be held for 10 days): F.S. § 538.06(1) requires <br />that aM goods acquired (unless the person to whom the <br />goods are to be transferred was the person from whom they <br />were first acquired) by a secondhand dealer must be held 15 <br />calendar days. Revise to conform to such statute? <br />11 -209 (Penalties): Retain these penalties? They exceed the <br />penalties authorized under F.S. § 162.22 for violations of <br />ordinances generally. <br />12 -1 (Ch. 316 Uniform Traffic Control Law adopted): Delete? <br />F.S. § 316.007 would appear to prohibit the "in toto" <br />adoption of Ch. 316. <br />12 -26 (Penalty for parking in handicapped zone): Under F.S. § <br />316.008(4), this could be raised to $250.00. Do so? Or, <br />leave as is? <br />13 -9 (Throwing or depositing garbage, trash, wastewater, <br />handbills, dirt, etc., on streets and sidewalks): Delete? <br />Or, retain? The city has, in section 13 -1, adopted state <br />law misdemeanors by reference. This offense is, essentially, <br />littering which is a misdemeanor under certain circumstances. <br />See F.S. § 403.413(6)(b). <br />13 -11 (Registration of religious institutions for Code <br />compliance): Retain? Or, delete? While the issue <br />is far from clear, it could be argued that this is a form of <br />licensing, albeit without payment of any fee, and could <br />therefore be argued to be a violation of the First Amendment. <br />Assuming that this was adopted to ensure compliance <br />with zoning regulations, and that, as to churches existing at <br />the time the ordinance was passed which were in zoning <br />districts where a church was considered a preexisting <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.