Municipal Code Corp.#1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

federal law." ? 17 -28 (Projecting signs over sidewalks or streets): Same questions as to 17 -4. 17 -34, 17 -35 (Nonconforming signs): Are these still necessary? Subsection (a) of 17 -35 would seem to indicate that nonconforming signs had to be brought into compliance 5 years after the adoption of Ord. No. 84 -2. 18 -3 (Nonoperational vehicles): Delete as superseded by Code § 10 -4 (which was adopted after this section)? 18 -4(c) (Testing manholes for gas): Revise the precatory "should" in the last sentence of (c) to read "shall "? 18 -16 (Leaving of goods, wares, etc., on sidewalks): The first sentence, through the first semicolon, would appear to conflict with section 18 -1 in that 18 -1 appears to allow certain obstructions upon approval of the chief of police or the city commission. Perhaps, revise the first sentence of this section to read as follows? "It shall be unlawful, except as otherwise provided in section [18 -11, for any person to place, put or leave any goods, wares,...." 18 V2 -1 et seq. (Tree protection chapter): Delete as superseded by subsection "6." of section 26 -7 of the zoning ordinance? If not, note that the definition of "tree" in this section differs from the zoning ordinance definition. If this chapter is retained, revise the "tree" definition to conform to the zoning ordinance definition? 19 -56 (Abbreviations): Revise the reference to Department of Environmental Regulation to "department of environmental protection "? (And the abbreviation to "DEP " ?) And, make such change throughout the chapter? Such as section 19- 61(b)? 19 -93, 19-117,19-128 (Surcharges for utility users outside city): While 19 -93, 19 -117 and 19 -128 are in conformance with F.S. § 180.191 (which permits surcharges of up to 25 percent), they are in conflict in that 19 -93 purports to impose a surcharge of 20 24