My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Municipal Code Corp.#1
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 01-06-01 Codification Services
>
Municipal Code Corp.#1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2012 7:27:02 AM
Creation date
12/28/2010 11:23:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Codifications
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
01-06-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
percent while the rates imposed under 19 -117 and 19 -128 are, <br />in fact, 25 percent higher. Please review each section and <br />advise as to any changes desired. Perhaps, simply revise 19- <br />93 to provide for a surcharge of 25 percent? <br />20 -30(b) (Taxicab drivers not to solicit business for hotels, or <br />houses "of ill repute "): The prohibition of soliciting business <br />for hotels is of doubtful constitutionality, on free speech <br />grounds. Delete such prohibition? And, change the <br />reference to "house of ill repute" to "house of prostitution "? <br />20 -35 (Prohibition of nonpaying passengers): Is this actually <br />enforced? Even when there is no paying passenger in <br />the vehicle? <br />22 -3 (Definition of "wetland vegetation "): Was this intended to <br />read "Wetland vegetation shall have the meaning as set out in <br />Rule 17 -301 of the Florida Administrative Code "? In any <br />event, such term does not appear to be defined. Although it <br />is unclear, it appears that former 17 -301 has been transferred <br />to 62- 301.200(3) and 62- 340.200(19). The latter defines <br />"wetlands," in part, by describing the types of vegetation <br />found in wetlands. Was this what was referred to? <br />App. A. (Subdivision regulations): Continue the current practice and <br />set this out as an appendix to the Code volume? Or, <br />codify as a chapter? If this is to be codified, the city may <br />wish to consider the following problems: <br />(1) Section 20A -2(I), Definition of "subdivision": In <br />some respects this is more restrictive than the <br />statutory definition (177.031(18)) in that the statute <br />applies to the division of land into three or more plats, <br />etc., while this applies to division into two or more <br />plats, etc. However, it is less restrictive in that it has <br />exemptions not found in the statute. Please review <br />and advise as to any revision desired. <br />(2) Section 20A -2(2), Definition of "Streets:": This <br />differs somewhat from F.S. § 177.031(17). Revise <br />to use such statute in place of the first, undesignated <br />paragraph of this definition? However, the <br />P*1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.