Municipal Code Corp.#1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(9) Section 26 -6, subsection Lb(1), single-family dwellings as a permitted use in R -IAA: Note that F.S. § 419.001 et seq. provides that certain community residential homes are single - family units for zoning purposes without the approval of local governments. While subsection Lb(l) is, arguably, not directly in conflict with the statute, would the city wish to add to this subsection (and all other subsections which permit single- family dwellings) language such as the following? ", including those community residential homes declared to be single- family units by state statute." (10) Section 26 -6, subsection Le. (9), "day care centers" as a conditional use: While the issue is far from clear (since special exception or use is not defined) it could be argued that F.S. § 166.0445 [which provides that registered or licensed family day care homes (which are defined in F.S. § 402.302(5)) are a valid residential use and prohibits special exception or use permit requirements in zoning ordinances] would require that this be placed in the permitted use category, as opposed to the conditional use category. (Note that § 26 -12, subsection 4.c refers to a conditional use as a special exception.) This assumes that the term "day care centers" (which is not defined in the zoning ordinance) was intended to refer to "family day care homes." The preceding comments would apply to all other subsections which permit day care centers in residential areas as a conditional use. Move this to the permitted uses category? (11) Section 26 -6, subsection 4.f(6) (b), minimum side yards in R -2 district:: It appears this should read "Side *: Seven and five tenths feet or 10 percent of lot width, whichever is greater. (12) Section 26 -6, subsection 6.f. (S) (b)2., minimum side yards for lots in mobile home parks: It appears this was intended to read "Side: None, provided no mobile home shall be located closer than 20 feet to any other 29