Laserfiche WebLink
mobile home." <br />(13) Section 26 -6, subsection IO.e(1), conditional uses in <br />the C -3 district :It appears that there is a repetition of <br />language. Specifically, the second phrase reading "of <br />the effective date of the establishment of the" should <br />be be deleted as duplicative of the immediately <br />preceding phrase. <br />(14) Section 26 -6, subsection II.e(6), day -care centers as <br />conditional use: Is this correct? That is, are day <br />care centers actually allowed in the M -1, light <br />industrial district? <br />(15) Section 26 -6, subsection 13.c.(2), "group care <br />homes "as a "conditional use" in thePBG -1 district: <br />The term now used in F.S. § 419.001(2) is <br />"community residential homes." Change the term <br />here? In addition see note (9) above as to <br />Section 26 -6, subsection Lb(1). <br />(16) Section 26 -7, subsection 6.II.Part B.(2)(a)4. [page <br />1712.181: What are the SF and MF entries in the table <br />supposed to represent? There are no such <br />districts listed in section 26 -2. <br />(17) Section 26 -7, subsection (10), mobile homes for <br />security of public and private facilities: If this <br />appendix is codified as a chapter, the same comments <br />would apply as are set out above with regard to Code <br />section 9 -17. Except, as to "Florida Highway <br />Patrolman," the city might wish to use the phrase <br />"uniformed member of the Florida Highway Patrol." <br />(18) Section 26 -7, subsection 17, patio houses, <br />illustration on page 1717: If this figure is to be <br />printed, we will need a better copy as it is illegible in <br />part. <br />(19) Section 26 -8, subsection l.e: Language appears to be <br />missing between the words "costs" and "be" in the <br />third line. What was intended is not readily apparent. <br />Please review and advise as to the missing language. <br />30 <br />