Laserfiche WebLink
(20) Section 26 -8, subsection 5.b(4)(b): Language appears <br />to be missing in the fifth line between the words <br />"regulations" and "modifies ". What was intended is <br />not readily apparent. Please review and advise as to <br />the missing language. <br />(21) Section 26 -9, subsection 2.a.(12), parking for <br />medical, etc. offices: Was the catchline intended to <br />read "Medical or dental offices or clinics "? <br />(22) Section 26 -11, board of zoning appeals: Is this board <br />still in existence? Note that Code § 2 -1670) <br />provides that the code enforcement board is charged <br />with enforcement of the zoning ordinance. <br />(23) Section 26 -11, subsections 4. and 8.a, authority of <br />board ofzoning appeals in regard to nonconforming <br />uses: If the board of zoning appeals is still in <br />existence (see note (22) above), note that subsection <br />4., on its face, appears to conflict with 8.a., in that 4. <br />clearly contemplates, under certain conditions, <br />allowing change of a use from one nonconforming use <br />to another, while 8.a. flatly prohibits any variance to <br />permit a nonconforming use in any district. Perhaps, <br />revise 8.a. to read as follows? <br />"a. To permit a nonconforming use, <br />except as otherwise provided in this <br />chapter, in any district." <br />(24) Section 26 -12, conditional uses: As with section 26- <br />11, is the planning board still in existence, in light of <br />Code § 2- 1670)? If not, substitute the phrase "code <br />enforcement board" in place of "planning board" in <br />this section and throughout the chapter? <br />(25) Section 26 -13.2, notice generally of zoning <br />ordinance amendments: Note that this conflicts, in <br />part, with F.S. § 166.041(3) in that, under certain <br />circumstances two hearings (as opposed to one) are <br />31 <br />