My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Addendum 2
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(07-03-01) General Engineering Services
>
Addendum 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2011 2:49:50 PM
Creation date
1/25/2011 2:38:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Engineering Svcs. for Gov. Infrastructure
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
07-03-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br /> <br />Q: Is it the designer's responsibility to supply the surveyor does the City supply it? <br />A: You will be responsiblefor the entire process, including geotechnical and surveying. <br />We want a turn-key project. <br /> <br />Q: Is the public going to be involved? <br />A: The public might be involved but we don't currently envision it. I don't see a lot of <br />public hearings, and you need to base your design on that. It may turn out that we <br />hold 15 public hearings, but if we do, that will be considered additional services. <br /> <br />Q: Is the Request for Qualifications limited to 15 pages? <br />A: Please limit yourselves to 15 pages. You will not be graded on the thickness of the <br />bundle, but on the content. You should be able to present your case succinctly. <br /> <br />Q: What kind of vehicles will have access to cross the bridge? <br />A: Maintenance vehicles and emergency vehicles - That's why we want the pedestrian <br />facilities to be moveable or portable. We have to setup a pattern that the emergency <br />vehicles know that they can maneuver through. <br /> <br />CLARIFICATION: <br /> <br />The RFQ information package asks for your expectations of the construction costs and NOT <br />what your costs are. We want to see if you are more qualified than the competition and that <br />you will use the latest technology or ideas that no one else uses. Again, I want to clarify that <br />although it does say "your estimated costs" please understand that it is notfor your fees, it's <br />independent of your fees. It is what you think the structures are going to cost. If you low- <br />ball the numbers, you will have to show us how you came to thatfigure. You can break them <br />out: "estimate for pedestrian bridge" and" estimate for boardwalk ". <br /> <br />We would like to look at your hours so we can see if you really grasp the aspects of this <br />project. We see the focus being permitting and structural. <br /> <br />As for the financials, show us that you are not in bankruptcy, etc. <br /> <br />We envision a nice facility built such that when we open it to traffic, we could still have <br />some very appealing space and amenities on the outside of that bridge for pedestrian access. <br /> <br />Q: I would like to make a suggestion/recommendation. The package is due on the <br />18th of April which is seven (7) days from today. That might be a little tight. I would <br />like to recommend an additional week or two to get the package together. <br />A: Thank you for thefeed back. We are going to send out an addendum changing the <br />bid opening date to April 25th, 2007 at lO:OOa.m. Everything else will remain the same. <br /> <br />Q: Do we have access to any existing surveys? <br />A: I don't know that any exists. <br /> <br />RH) 117-113-01 ":ngineering Sr" BriJge (.\JJenJum.2) <br /> <br />Page .) of .j <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.