My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Specifications
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
ITB
>
(07-05-01) 172nd St. Roadway Improvements
>
Specifications
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2011 11:58:40 AM
Creation date
1/28/2011 11:57:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
172nd St. Roadway Improvements
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
07-05-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
Bid
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1.04 <br /> <br />06/07 <br /> <br />ENGINEER'S REVIEW OF SHOP DRAWINGS <br /> <br />A. The Engineer's review of drawings, data and samples submitted by the <br />Contractor will cover only general conformity to the Specifications, external <br />connections, and dimensions that affect the installation. The Engineer's review <br />and exceptions if any, will not constitute an approval of dimensions, quantities, <br />and details of the material, equipment, device, or item shown. <br /> <br />B. The review of drawings and schedules will be general, and shall not be <br />construed: <br /> <br />1. As permitting any departure from the Contract requirements; <br /> <br />2. As relieving the Contractor of responsibility for any errors, including <br />details, dimensions, and materials; <br /> <br />3. As approving departures from details furnished by the Engineer, except as <br />otherwise provided herein. <br /> <br />C. If the drawings or schedule as submitted describe variations per subparagraph <br />(1.05.C), and show a departure from the Contract requirements which Engineers <br />finds to be in the interest of the Owner and to be minor as not to involve a change <br />in the Contract Price or time for performance, the Engineer may return the <br />reviewed drawings without noting an exception. <br /> <br />D. When reviewed by the Engineer, each of the Shop Drawings will be identified as <br />having received such review being so stamped and dated. Shop Drawings <br />stamped "REJECTED" and with required corrections shown will be returned to <br />the Contractor for correction and re-submittal. <br /> <br />E. Re-submittals will be handled in the same manner as the first submittals. On <br />resubmittals, the Contractor shall direct specific attention, in writing or on <br />resubmitted Shop Drawings, to revisions other than the corrections requested by <br />the Engineer on previous submissions. The Contractor shall make any <br />corrections required by the Engineer. <br /> <br />F. If the Contractor considers any correction indicated on the drawings to constitute <br />a change to the Contract Drawings or Specifications, the Contractor shall give <br />written notice thereof to the Engineer. <br /> <br />G. The Engineer will review a submittallresubmittal a maximum of three (3) times <br />after which cost of review will be borne by the Contractor. The cost of <br />engineering shall be equal to the Engineer's charges to the Owner under the <br />terms of the Engineer's agreement with the Owner. <br /> <br />H. When the Shop Drawings have been completed to the satisfaction of the <br />Engineer, the Contractor shall carry out the construction in accordance therewith <br />and shall make no further changes therein except upon written instructions from <br />the Engineer. <br /> <br />01340-3 <br /> <br />03-4197 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.