My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2017-2750
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2017
>
Reso 2017-2750
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2020 9:43:56 AM
Creation date
10/24/2017 2:45:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2017-2750
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
10/19/2017
Description
Create Public Arts Advisory Committee (PAAC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recommendations on the selection of specific projects, including recommendations on <br /> where to site the finished artwork, if a site has not already been selected by Staff. <br /> Proposed Art Guidelines <br /> Recommendations for the selection of Public Art will be based on the following <br /> guidelines, as they may be amended from time to time. <br /> • Does it have artistic merit? Is there an inherent quality and sense of excellence? <br /> • Does the project foster the overall goals of the Cultural Master Plan? Does it <br /> accomplish the purpose of this Program? <br /> • Relevance and overall positive impact of the Public Art under consideration to the <br /> City, including its values, culture, and people. Consideration will be given to whether <br /> it has historical value, addresses a social or environmental issue, or addresses the <br /> community as a whole or a specific interest in this culturally diverse community? <br /> • Is the design visionary and creative? How does it engage the community and invite <br /> interest? Is it thought-provoking, entertaining, whimsical, original and/or <br /> representative of high artistic excellence in urban design and public art? Does it have <br /> emotional, inspirational, educational or intellectual impact? Overall, does it uniquely <br /> enhance community identity and generally enhance the public realm? <br /> • Relationship of the work to the site, i.e., does it serves to activate, enhance or foster <br /> community involvement/ public participation in that particular public space? Are the <br /> sites selected varied so as to be particularly enjoyed by the population living nearby? <br /> • Appropriateness of the artwork or design enhancement in terms of scale, materials, <br /> form and content to the site should be evaluated. Do the scale, form and content <br /> serve a functional purpose? In what way does it otherwise enhance or define a civic <br /> space? <br /> • Consideration should be given to structural and surface integrity, permanence and <br /> outdoor protection of the artwork against theft, vandalism, weathering, and excessive <br /> maintenance and repair costs; <br /> • Experience of the artist in the creation of public art must be part of the criteria. Does <br /> the artist have a successful track record, having executed and installed works of <br /> public art in a timely manner and within budget that will provide evidence of the ability <br /> to successfully complete a project? In some cases, consideration may be given to <br /> whether the project fosters opportunities for local community artists. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.