Laserfiche WebLink
<br />F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FOR <br />THIS CONTRACT <br />(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. <br />Complete one Section F for each project.) <br />20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY <br />NUMBER <br /> <br />21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED <br />Hardbottom and Reef Community Monitoring for the Hillsboro/Deerfield <br />Beach Nourishment Project, Deerfield Beach, Florida <br />PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) <br />2015 2010 <br />23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION <br />a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER <br />Cities of Hillsboro & Deerfield Beach Linda Sunderland 954-519-1483 <br />24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) <br /> <br /> <br />CSA conducted pre-construction, weekly mid-construction, <br />monthly post-construction, and three annual post-construction <br />biological monitoring surveys of benthic hardbottom and reef <br />habitats offshore Hillsboro and Deerfield Beach, Florida, in relation <br />to a beach nourishment project. The biological monitoring plan <br />consisted of quantitative and qualitative habitat assessments of <br />nearshore hardbottom in order to determine potential impacts from <br />migration of beach fill onto nearshore hardbottom communities or <br />movement of sand from the borrow area onto adjacent offshore <br />reefs. <br />Eighteen permanent, cross-shore (east-west) transects <br />(10 nearshore, 8 offshore) were established and monitored in both <br />project and reference areas. Transect length was dependent on <br />hardbottom/reef availability, and transect depths ranged from 3 m <br />to 20 m. Percent cover of substrates, benthic flora, and fauna <br />were visually estimated in situ by sampling 1-m2 quadrats. <br />Individual counts were made of all corals, sponges, octocorals, <br />and other fauna within each quadrat. Maximum relief of <br />hardbottom, coral colony diameter, octocoral height, dominant <br />macroalgae thalli height, and sediment depth were measured <br />within each quadrat. Photographs of each quadrat were also <br />taken. <br />During the pre-, mid-, and monthly post-construction surveys, five <br />permanently tagged stony corals along the length of each <br />permanent transect were assessed for health and potential <br />sedimentation stress incurred from beach renourishment activities. <br />Coral colonies were photographed and evaluated for potential <br />signs of sedimentation stress using a four-tiered Stress Index. <br />Maximum sediment depth was measured at every meter along <br />each permanent transect and every meter along 60-m temporary north-south transects. Temporary transects were <br />located perpendicular to the eastern end of nearshore transects and the western end of offshore transects in order to <br />flank the borrow area and monitor for potential sediment impacts from dredging. In addition, CSA scientists collected <br />video data in quantitative format along each permanent and temporary transect for later analysis in the event signs of <br />impact were detected from other monitoring methods. <br />Total Project Cost: $576,583. <br />25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT <br />a. <br />(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE <br />CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. Stuart, Florida Biological Monitoring <br />94