Laserfiche WebLink
<br />F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS <br />FOR THIS CONTRACT <br />(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. <br />Complete one Section F for each project.) <br />20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY <br />NUMBER <br /> <br />21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED <br />Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring for the Martin County Shore Protection <br />Project, Stuart, Florida <br />PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) <br />2018 2013 <br />23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION <br />a. PROJECT OWNER b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER <br />Martin County Kathy Fitzpatrick 772-288-5429 <br />24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size, and cost) <br /> <br /> <br />CSA conducted a baseline pre-construction survey in 2010, an <br />immediate post-construction survey in 2013, and four annual post- <br />construction surveys from 2014 to 2017 to characterize, monitor, <br />and map nearshore hardbottom habitats offshore Martin County, <br />Florida in relation to beach nourishment associated with the Martin <br />County Shore Protection Project. Surveys were conducted in <br />accordance with a biological monitoring plan approved by Florida <br />Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Twelve <br />permanent, cross-shore monitoring transects were established from <br />the project’s equilibrium-toe-of-fill (ETOF) to the east a distance of <br />152 m. CSA scientists collected quantitative and qualitative video <br />data along each transect. Percent cover of substrate, wormrock, <br />macroalgae, corals, sponges, and other benthic fauna were <br />determined from analysis of quantitative video data using random <br />point count software (CPCe). <br />Along each transect, percent cover of substrates, wormrock, <br />macroalgae, corals, sponges, and other benthic fauna were also <br />visually estimated in situ by sampling 0.25-m2 quadrats at up to <br />12 point-intercept locations. Within each quadrat, individual counts <br />were made of all corals, sponges, tunicate colonies, urchins, and <br />holothuroids; maximum and mean heights of the two dominant algal <br />species were measured; and maximum vertical relief of hardbottom <br />was measured. Sediment accumulation was measured at five <br />random locations within each quadrat and at each meter along the <br />length of each transect. <br />The nearshore edge of exposed hardbottom was mapped by divers <br />to document position relative to the shoreline and to characterize <br />the benthic community along the edge within the survey area. <br />Comprehensive annual biological monitoring reports and data <br />deliverables (including GIS mapping products) were submitted to <br />the client pursuant to FDEP Joint Coastal Permit application requirements. This project was conducted as a <br />subcontract to Taylor Engineering, Inc. and Ecological Associates, Inc. <br />Annual Project Cost: $112,000 to $135,000. <br />25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT <br />a. <br />(1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) (3) ROLE <br />CSA Ocean Sciences Inc. Stuart, Florida Nearshore Hardbottom Monitoring <br />95