Laserfiche WebLink
| Page 29 <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach | RFQ No. 18-02-01 | March 22, 2018 <br />Marine And Coastal Professional Engineering Consulting Services (CCNA) <br />E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT <br />(Complete one Section E for each key person.) <br /> 12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT 14. YEARS EXPERIENCE <br />Craig C. Clevenger, PG Environmental Engineering a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM <br />26 17 <br />15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State) <br />EE&G Environmental Services, LLC Miami Lakes, Florida <br />16. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION)17. CURRENT PROFFESIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE) <br />Bachelor of Science, Comprehensive Geology <br />Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield,; <br />Graduate Studies in Advanced Hydrogeology, <br />University of Missouri, Columbia <br />Florida Professional Geologist: Florida # PG1666 <br />18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) <br />1993/40-Hour OSHA Hazmat Training; 1996/8-Hour OSHA Supervisor Hazmat Training; FDEP 24-Hour Oil Spill Prevention, <br />Response, Control & Cleanup, 1990 <br />19. RELEVANT PROJECTS <br />a. <br />(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)(2) YEAR COMPLETED <br />Environmental Due Diligence and Source Removal to Address <br />Former Underground Storage Tank (UST) Petroleum Discharge & Solvent Discharge, Miami, Florida <br />PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) <br />2016 N/A <br />(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm. <br />Project Director to conduct Phase I and Phase II ESA assessment prior to acquisition. Based on the due diligence <br />assessment, two source areas were identified, including a former UST petroleum discharge area and a separate solvent <br />discharge area. EE&G conducted source removal soil excavations, added in-situ chemicals to aid in natural attenuation of the <br />residual impacts, and post-excavation groundwater monitoring. The client required expedited due diligence to complete the <br />Phase I and Phase II ESA prior to acquisition, and the expedited excavation of petroleum and solvent affected soils from <br />source areas to facilitate the redevelopment into a concrete plant. <br />b. <br />(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)(2) YEAR COMPLETED <br />Environmental Due Diligence Assessments, Tank Removal, and Site Assessment, Miami, Florida <br />PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) <br />2017 N/A <br />(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm. <br />Project Director. Phase I ESAs were prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in the American Society of Testing <br />and Materials (ASTM) Practice Designation E 1527-13. The Phase II ESAs were prepared in general accordance with ASTM <br />1903-11. The information and conclusions presented in the Reports were subject to inherent limitations identified in the ASTM <br />E 1527-13 and ASTM E1903-11 guidelines. The two regulatory reports, TCAR and SAR, were prepared in accordance with <br />Chapter 62-761, Florida Administrative Code (FAC) and Chapter 62-780, FAC, respectively. <br />c. <br />(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)(2) YEAR COMPLETED <br />Lead Impacted Soil (Source) Removal, Assessments, and <br />Reports, 19th Street Lead Superfund Site, 3626 19th Street North, St. Petersburg, Pinellas County, Florida <br />PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) <br />2017 N/A <br />(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm. <br />Project Director. This source removal was completed under the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) submitted to the <br />USEPA in November 2016, the QAPP and associated Work Plan summarized cleanup procedures to the USEPA. The QAPP <br />and Work Plan were reviewed and approved by the USEPA prior to the implementation the source removal project. The <br />primary objective of the project was to remove lead-contaminated soils exceeding 400 parts per million (ppm) at the residential <br />property to meet the eligibility criteria for lead contaminated soil. Based on the excavation, transport and off-site disposal of <br />the identified lead impacted soils, as well as the confirmation laboratory analytical sampling and field XRF sampling <br />surrounding the residential building