My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-0130 Special City Commission Meeting
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
City Commission Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-0130 Special City Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2013 2:03:33 PM
Creation date
2/27/2013 2:03:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-City Commission
Meeting Type
Special
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/30/2013
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary Minutes:Special City Commission Meeting January 30,2013 Sunny Isles Beach,Florida <br /> somewhat of a disagreement as to the cost of the new redesign fee that has been proposed to <br /> move forward on that garage. In addition we do not have the cost being given to us for the <br /> entire build-out of the Project and then to even more complicate this we really need to go <br /> back and revise the budget to include the fact that we are now building this shell space at the <br /> base of the garage and to reevaluate the dollar amount that we had budgeted before at$16.5 <br /> Million to a higher number to include the shell space that is being included. We need to get <br /> all this information together and hopefully before we meet again at our February Commission <br /> Meeting [February 21, 2013] to keep everything on track. We need to get all this information <br /> so that we can evaluate as Commissioners of what is being proposed to us and what cost is <br /> being proposed to us. Because we do have a duty to spend our tax dollars wisely and we <br /> really can't move forward unless we know with some sort of a certainty as to how much <br /> money this whole project is going to cost rather than to walk into a project without having all <br /> the facts before us, and then be faced with an unknown cost that could possibly escalate in <br /> the future. He thinks the time now is to stand back for a minute or two, get all the facts,and <br /> come to a more proper conclusion. He is hoping tonight that we can at least get the budget <br /> process going to where we can basically give staff the latitude of knowing how far they can <br /> negotiate when they are talking to the Contractor. <br /> City Clerk Hines read the title, and City Manager Russo reported noting that he did ask 4M <br /> Investors. LLC(the"Contractor")to redesign the parking garage including as the Mayor said, <br /> the multi-purpose shell on the first floor which was a substantial change to add that shell to <br /> be built into it. We received a letter which was forwarded on to the Commission dated <br /> January 16. 2013 from the Contractor submitting a redesign fee in the amount of <br /> $1,290,000.00 to redesign the parking garage structure with the shell. The Contractor stated <br /> the design plans submitted thus far to the City cannot be used for the redesign project even <br /> though the City had paid the Contractor for those plans already. After some deliberations <br /> and discussions internally we decided to contact Architect Nina Gladstone who had worked <br /> on this from the former design group of Spillis. Candela and Partners,which is now AECOM <br /> Design, who had designed both the Government Center and the Heritage Park Garage, to <br /> provide a review of the original proposal. That review was based on a request and that letter <br /> was included also dated January 25,2013 requesting her firm do a review of the contract cost <br /> proposal in the context of the design-build project. Based upon her review of the proposal <br /> their opinion was that the drawings can be used except for the drawings related to the parking <br /> garage and surrounding area issues. She stated that the modifications to the parking garage <br /> will have little affect on the drawings of the Park and will be mostly coordinating entrances <br /> and site re-grading. Their number which is also broken down in her response for the new <br /> design of the parking garage and the shell space was slightly over $826,000. considerably <br /> less than the price submitted by the Contractor. Initially the City Commission's opinion was <br /> that the City should obtain a total cost, you can't take the design cost without taking it in <br /> conjunction with the entire construction cost. As the Mayor just mentioned, it is a design- <br /> build project which requires us to have both those numbers before we can move forward. <br /> That brings us up to the point where we are now, staff cannot go forward without having our <br /> bottom line. We need to know what is the maximum total budget for the program that the <br /> Commission wants. Our recommendation is that we stick with the specified program that the <br /> Commission already directed us to do for a maximum budget price. The Resolution is <br /> suggesting $20 Million maximum total cost inclusive of all expenses thus far, and that is <br /> what we have worked from. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.