Erdman Anthony of Florida, Inc. - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT (Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. Complete One Section F for each project.) 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER 4 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) Palm Beach Underground Peer Review Palm Beach, FL 22. YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2017 CONSTRUCTION (if applicable) 23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION a. PROJECT OWNER Town of Palm Beach b. POINT OF CONTACT NAME Patricia Strayer c. POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER 561-838-5440 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (Include scope, size and cost) Erdman Anthony was on the peer review team to assist the Town of Palm Beach in performing an independent, technical peer review of the Town Wide Undergrounding of Utilities Mater Plan that was completed by another firm. As part of this effort, we investigated a specific set of charge questions that the Town has developed. This was accomplished by reviewing the Master Plan documents, analyzing the project’s approach and design, scheduling, sequencing, phasing, and cost estimates. The peer review team included other subject matter experts including a finance consultant and an electrical engineer: Anthony Hansen from Patterson and Dewar Engineers, Inc. Our work began with a data collection effort that included the construction documents for phase 1, cost estimates, traffic control plans, contractor bids, contractor schedules, and utility (FPL, ATT, CATV) estimates and assumptions. conducting a number of interviews. Another initial step was a kick off meeting with the key stakeholders from the Town, design firm, and contractors. Following our review of the documents provided, interviews were held with select team members including the Town staff, design engineer, contractor, and utility companies. Once all the data was compiled and analyzed, our peer review team developed recommendations which were identified as having a potential impact to the budget, schedule, functionality, or risk and which were tabulated in the following five focus areas: program management and delivery, cost, scheduling and sequencing, planning and engineering design, traffic impacts. We developed a written summary for each finding as well as a recommended action and potential impacts. Our conclusions were presented to the Town Undergrounding Task Force Committee and the Town Council at public meetings. The Town then decided which elements to adopt and in what manner they would be adopted. The Town of Palm Beach’s project is a large, city-wide undertaking, and our suggestions to improve the program management with a detailed plan, monitoring tools, and reporting were some of the recommendations that the Town seemed the most likely to adopt. 25. FIRMS FROM SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT a (1) FIRM NAME Erdman Anthony of Florida, Inc. (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State) West Palm Beach, FL (3) ROLE Subconsultant