My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
envirowaste services group inc.
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
ITB
>
(19-08-01) Stormwater Management System Preventative Maintenance
>
Responses
>
envirowaste services group inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2019 4:25:05 PM
Creation date
9/16/2019 4:23:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 375-02043 <br />CONTRACTOR MAINTENANCE <br />FIELD PERFORMANCE REPORT 05114 <br />Contractor: Envirowaste 0 <br />Contract: E5U38 <br />Evaluation Date: January 7, 2019 <br />Type of Evaluation: 0 Periodic Q Final <br />category une <br />Pursuit and Timely Completion of Work <br />Performance <br />The Contractor performed all work in an effective and expedient manner. The Department's <br />Excellent <br />expectations regarding timely pursuit and completion of the work were often exceeded. <br />Q <br />Except for a few occasions, the Contractor completed all of the work within authorized timeframes. The <br />Satisfactory <br />Contractor consistently demonstrated sufficient efforts to complete work in a timely fashion. The <br />Department's expectations regarding timely pursuit and completion of the work were usually met and <br />0 <br />sometimes exceeded. <br />Satisfactory <br />0 <br />The Contractor occasionally completed the work in a timely manner, but efforts were consistently less <br />Unsatisfactory <br />than adequate. Department involvement was required on more than one occasion to prompt the <br />0 <br />Contractor to complete the work. <br />Unsatisfactory <br />The Contractor failed to complete the work in a timely fashion. On several occasions the Contractor <br />Poor <br />failed to begin work in a timely fashion, and the Contractor made little effort to correct deficiencies. <br />0 <br />Substantial Department involvement was required to prompt completion of the work, including written <br />Poor <br />correspondence advising the Contractor of potential default. Expectations were not met. <br />0 <br />Notes & Comments <br />All work was completed within contract time. The Contractor performed work efficiently, and consistently performed work <br />in a timely manner. <br />Vate_gory l wo <br />Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) & Safety Operations <br />Performance <br />MOT setups and compliance were proper with no correctable complaints from Department personnel <br />Excellent <br />andlor traveling public. No incidents or injuries occurred within work zones due to improper MOT. <br />Qualified MOT personnel were present at all times. Expectations were exceeded, Contractor often <br />0 <br />went above and beyond FDOT Design Standard requirements to ensure safety for both work crews and <br />traveling public. <br />MOT setups and compliance were mostly proper with few correctable complaints from Department <br />due to improper <br />Satisfactory <br />0 <br />personnel and/or traveling public. No incidents or injuries occurred within work zones <br />MOT. Qualified MOT personnel were present. Expectations were met and exceeded occasionally. <br />MOT setups and compliance were at times achieved, but there were several complaints and/or <br />Unsatisfactory <br />incidents of non-compliance. No major incidents or injuries occurred within work zones due to improper <br />MOT. Qualified MOT personnel were usually present. Some involvement from Department personnel <br />0 <br />was required on a few occasions. Expectations were not consistently met. <br />Proper MOT deployment and overall compliance was lacking. Numerous correctable complaints from <br />Poor <br />Department personnel and/or traveling public were noted. An incident with injuries may have occurred <br />within the work zone due to improper MOT, Qualified MOT personnel were seldom on site or in close <br />0 <br />proximity to the work site. Expectations were not met. <br />N/A <br />N/A (To be used when MOT was not necessary or included in the contract). <br />0 <br />Notes & Comments <br />The Contractor consistently maintained proper MOT set-ups and quickly addressed any concerns. Contractor's focus on <br />safe operations for pedestrian and traveling public were excellent and there were no injuries or accidents during the <br />project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.