Laserfiche WebLink
375-026-03 <br />MAINTENANCE <br />06!14 <br />Contractor: Envirowaste <br />Contract: HUM <br />Evaluation Date: Jan 7, 2019 <br />uateg_ory I nree <br />Performance <br />Timely and Complete Submittal of Documents and Reports <br />Performance <br />Excellent <br />Written correspondence and documentation were error free and critical dates were met. <br />O <br />Contractor adequately followed the contract from a written correspondence perspective. Quality in <br />Satisfactory <br />0 <br />relation to written correspondence was good with few errors. <br />Department personnel encountered issues with the overall quality of the written correspondence or <br />Unsatisfactory <br />overall timeliness of contract document submittal. <br />0 <br />Overall quality control from a corresponden celpaperwork aspect was not met. Excessiveprompting <br />from Department personnel for required documentation was required and the correction of substandard <br />Poor <br />low quality work was necessary. Contractor failed to submit required documents such as Form 21-A <br />0 <br />within allowable time. <br />Poor <br />0 <br />Notes & Comments <br />The Contractor submitted quality and accurate documentation consistently. All critical dates were met during the contract. <br />Catpennr Fnur <br />Overall Quality Control, Environmental Compliance, and Compliance with Contract <br />Performance <br />Requirements <br />Contractor followed all of the requirements/conditions of the contract with superior quality in accordance <br />Excellent <br />with FDOT Standards and Specifications (including environmental issues if applicable). Contractor was <br />0 <br />self-sufficient requiring no help from the Department. <br />Satisfactory <br />Contractor consistently performed quality work operations according to the contract with few errors. <br />0 <br />Overall quality control in the field was not consistently met. Department personnel were often required <br />Unsatisfactory <br />0 <br />to prompt the Contractor for correction of substandard or low quality work. <br />The Department identified notable errors and failures to meet contract requirements. Overall quality <br />Poor <br />0 <br />control was only met on occasion. <br />Notes & Comments <br />During operations the Contractor provided high quality Quality Control and remained in with the contract documents for <br />the life of the contract. <br />