My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Eisman & Russo, Inc.
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(20-07-01) Continuing Professional Consulting Services (CCNA)
>
Responses
>
Eisman & Russo, Inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2020 3:09:57 PM
Creation date
8/24/2020 3:09:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Project Documentation (weight=.13) <br />1. Kept Monthly and Final estimates up to date as the project progressed.4 <br />2. Tracked, reviewed and monitored RFI's, shop drawings, contract changes, and other action <br />items to achieve timely resolution. <br />4 <br />3. Prepared and organized thorough and complete project documentation including a clear <br />filing system, Daily diaries, claims documentation, Compliance monitoring and documentation, <br />weather letters, and other project records. <br />4 <br />4. Input information and documentation into Site Manager, EDMS, and MAC in a timely manner <br />and complied with electronic documentation requirements. <br />4 <br />5. Accurately verified pay items. <br />6. Contract modifications submitted are clear, accurate and include sufficient backup <br />documentation. <br />4 <br />Average Score 4.0 <br />Rating Scale: 1 - 5 <br />FDOT Evaluator Section Comments: <br /> <br />E. Effective Administration of the Construction Contract (weight=.24) <br />1. Administered the contract according to the plans, specifications and Contract provisions. <br />Provide clear and timely interpretation of contract documents to Contractor. <br />4 <br />2. Reviewed, approved, and monitored the contractor's QC plan. Took action when necessary. <br />Verified that materials used by the Contractor substantially conformed to plans, specifications <br />and contract provisions. <br />4 <br />3. Provided daily inspection and testing services as required by the contract and shared results <br />with the Contractor. Reviewed Contractor's QC results, compared to VT results and took <br />appropriate actions. <br />4 <br />4. The estimate (Monthly or Final) is true and correct as determined by the Consultant's <br />reasonable and independent investigation and measurements. <br />4 <br />5. Effectively and accurately administered the CPPR to hold the Contractor accountable for <br />performance. Explained criteria at the pre-construction conference, discussed at the progress <br />meetings and maintained accurate records. Utilized the CPPR process effectively to encourage <br />Contractor to take full responsibility for quality at all levels and to properly document those <br />items if they did not. When warranted, withheld estimates and issued verbal warnings, <br />deficiency warning letters, and deficiency letters as appropriate. Ensure all verbal warnings, <br />deficiency warning letters, and deficiency letters are clearly documented on the Daily Work <br />Reports. <br />4 <br />Average Score 4.0 <br />Rating Scale: 1 - 5 <br />FDOT Evaluator Section Comments: <br /> <br />Page 6 of 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.