My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2021-3170
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2021
>
Reso 2021-3170
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2021 12:52:04 PM
Creation date
3/3/2021 4:15:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2021-3170
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/18/2021
Description
Adopting the Town Center North Public Engagement Report Prepared by Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Of the four (4) strategies, the option that seems most generally favored by process participants is <br />"A Narrower Focus." This is not just based on "votes" emitted during the two virtual workshops (where <br />this option garnered 40°/a of the votes, overall), but on general input collected thorughout the public <br />engagement process, which really served to frame the strategy. 'A Narrower Focus" could allow the City <br />to focus efforts on the commercial corridor "subdistrict" that most process participants expressed opinions <br />on during the process. This option scored highest based on the evaluation criteria developed for this <br />process. <br />The "Let it Be" and "A New Vision" concepts both received moderate public support (25% and 21%, <br />respectively). and could offer compromise solutions. <br />The "Let it Be" option maintains the TCNO boundaries as they currently exist, while keeping to the original <br />overlay intent in the Comprehensive Plan.This strategy "goes back to basics;' focusing on solving the care <br />issue that gave rise to this process, without necessarily modifying other aspects of the overlay. However, <br />choosing this option requires amending the Zoning Code's Town Center Zoning District (as do other <br />options), to achieve consistency with the Comprehensive Plan's TCNO. <br />'A New Vision'would allow the City to treat the distinct "sub districts" of the overlay (i.e., bayfront, midtown, <br />commercial corridor) with tailored approaches that reflect the aspirations and preferences expressed by <br />the community through this process. Both options scored moderately in the evaluation process, mostly <br />because of the length and complexity of the processes involved. <br />• These three options involve adopting density and intensity measures, which are statutorily required to <br />achieve compliance with the Florida Statutes (Sec. 163.3177(6)(a)1.). The options on this decision are <br />to (a) use the same metrics that are already included in the Zoning Code (fCZD); (b) to use the metrics <br />that are part of the overlay's underlying land use districts; or (c) to introduce new and distinct metrics that <br />are lower or higher than either of the existing metrics. <br />• Public input generally supports maintaining the same range of densities, intensities and heights represented <br />in the district today. The current average density is 67 DU/AC and the current average building height is 6 <br />stories. Approximately 91% of the buildings are 10 stories or less. In other cases, participants using similar <br />phrasing ("as is") refer to building height caps currently in the Town Center Zoning District.. The table <br />on the next page recaps relevant parametric data provided in Section II of the report (Snapshot of the <br />Present) to facilitate a comparison. <br />• Many participants prefer the present variety of building forms and masses in the Town Center Area, rather <br />than the sense of uniformity and the "canyon wall" effect that they associate with the east side of Collins <br />Avenue. <br />• In the public opinion, the concept of density is often equated, or lumped together, with the height of <br />a building in the public's mind, but the two should not be confused. Density does not have to be <br />overwhelming in scale, and it can be achieved through smaller -scale buildings. <br />• Any density or intensity changes undertaken as a result of this process which might result in a reduction <br />of development capacity should only be adopted after thorough analysis by the City's planning and legal <br />team establishing that the changes are based on rational reasons and a legitimate public interest that is <br />further by the action, and that property owners are still provided with an economically reasonable use <br />of land. <br />90 City of Sunny Isles Beach <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.