Laserfiche WebLink
F. EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM’S <br />QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT <br />(Present as many projects as requested by the agency, or 10 projects, if not specified. <br />Complete one Section F for each project.) <br /> 20. EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY NUMBER <br />8 <br /> 21. TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) 22. YEAR COMPLETED <br />SUNRISE PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX <br />SUNRISE, FL <br />PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (IF APPLICABLE) <br />2009 2011 <br />23. PROJECT OWNER’S INFORMATION <br />A. PROJECT OWNER B. POINT OF CONTACT NAME C. POINT OF CONTACT PHONE NUMBER <br />CITY OF SUNRISE SEAN VISNERS, DEPUTY CHIEF (954) 746 - 3370 <br /> 24. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS CONTRACT (INCLUDE SCOPE, SIZE AND COST) <br />ADG was selected by the City of Sunrise for the design of a new 132,000-SF <br />Sunrise Public Safety Complex. The contracted scope of services included the <br />development of a detailed spatial needs assessment, master planning, cost <br />estimating, design, and construction administration. The public safety complex <br />was designed to house the entire operations of the Sunrise Police Department, the <br />joint county / city 911 communications center (PSAP), fire-rescue administration <br />and training, municipal EOC, city-wide management information systems (MIS) <br />data center, and an eight-lane indoor firing range. <br />Police divisions within the complex included administration, internal affairs, <br />records, detective’s division, crime scene unit, crime analysis unit, property and <br />evidence, victim advocacy program, patrol, SWAT, and crisis negotiation unit. <br />The facility design also included an evidence processing lab, located on the <br />second floor across from the evidence drop and storage area. The lab includes <br />stainless steel counters, chemical resistant cabinets, epoxy flooring, a fume hood, <br />emergency eye wash, and various analysis equipment. <br />The project site was located within the city’s municipal complex. The existing <br />buildings located on-site provided a context for the design referenced through <br />colors, materials, and complimentary details, creating a unified sense of identity <br />within the complex. During the project planning phase, ADG examined vehicle <br />and pedestrian access, utility network, and overall site infrastructure connections <br />with modification recommendations to benefit current municipal complex <br />functionality and enhance future improvements. This project received the Eagle <br />Award for Excellence in Construction. <br />25. FIRMS FOR SECTION C INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT <br />A (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)(3) ROLE <br />ARCHITECTS DESIGN GROUP WINTER PARK, FL ARCHITECT OF RECORD <br />B (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)(3) ROLE <br />TLC ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS ORLANDO, FL SECURITY & TECHNOLOGY <br />C (1) FIRM NAME (2) FIRM LOCATION (City and State)(3) ROLE <br />DEREK WASSINK, PE (PREVIOUS FIRM)FORT LAUDERDALE, FL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING <br />42