My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Addendum #6 RFP 22-04-01 CITYWIDE FIBER NETWORK DEPLOYMENT - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 22-04-01 Citywide Fiber Network Deployment
>
Addendum #6 RFP 22-04-01 CITYWIDE FIBER NETWORK DEPLOYMENT - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/25/2022 9:52:55 AM
Creation date
5/25/2022 9:52:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> <br /> <br />Q22. Will the City provide a laydown yard/site to store materials and equipment? <br />A22. Contractor needs to advise what storage capacity is needed and the City will provide space <br />under the William Lehman causeway. Contractor to provide and maintain the temporary <br />secured fencing. <br /> <br />Q23. How will the City handle material delays that far exceed the completion dates set forth of <br />this RFP? <br />A23. The contractor must state their lead time schedule on material. The City may negotiate <br />the project term accordingly. <br /> <br />Q24. 1. Per pricing sheet, section “General Labor”, line #162: No value of 2” EMT was listed for <br />installation. Please clarify if this is required in the project, especially if needed for the garage <br />portion of the project? <br />A24. This is not expected to be needed for the project but left to get pricing in case additional <br />electrical outlets are needed. <br /> <br />Q25. Per pricing sheet, section “General Labor”, line #164: A value of eleven (11) ten-foot (10’) <br />runs of 2” riser was requested. Can you please clarify if this is to be RGS, EMT, or PVC? <br />A25. This would be PVC and would be used to transition from underground conduit to a PVC <br />riser to enter the building. <br /> <br />Q26. Per pricing sheet, section “Underground Material”, line #206: Can you please provide a <br />requested depth of enclosure? Only value listed was 17” x 30”. <br />A26. Recommend making depth match the underground route path. I do not think this has <br />been finalized. <br /> <br />Q27. Per pricing sheet, section “Underground Material”, line #208: Can you please provide a <br />requested depth of enclosure? Only value listed was 30” x 48”. <br />A27. Recommend making depth match the underground route path. I do not think this has <br />been finalized. <br /> <br />Q28. Per pricing sheet, section “Patch Panels and Cabinets”, line #287: <br />a. Can you please provide a requested size of enclosure? These are to make the <br />transition from outside to inside of the building. Recommend contractor make a <br />recommendation on size to accommodate fiber bend radius <br />b. Will these be installed indoors/outdoors? Outdoor <br />i. If indoors, will they be mounted to existing backboards or will those need to be <br />provided? <br />ii. If outdoors, can we use industry standards for a support stand? Yes <br />c. What other items will need to be mounted inside of these enclosures? Expected to pull <br />OSP cable through enclosure to patch panel mounted inside. If needed a splice tray <br />could be installed in closure to transition from OSP cable to ISP cable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.