Laserfiche WebLink
0 o. Continuing Professional Services for Architectural, Landscape Architectural, <br />Engineering and Land Surveying Firm Only (CCNA) - RFQ No. 14 -07 -02 <br />E <br />E <br />completed, the budget, and the staff needed to complete each item. Our company President presides over <br />these meetings to insure each project and task is allocated the necessary resources. <br />QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE <br />a. Quality Control (quality services) <br />Project efforts can be ineffective and time consuming if accomplished <br />incorrectly. Our proactive philosophy emphasizes the early resolution of <br />project issues. An on -going quality control process goes a long way <br />identifying these key issues early. RJ Behar will ensure the quality of <br />its product. We strongly believe that we are solely accountable for the <br />delivered product, including the quality of our sub - consultants' product. <br />A synopsis of our quality program is outlined below. <br />1. QC Personnel <br />An autonomous reviewer, who is completely independent from <br />the design teams' staff, performs the review. The personnel <br />chosen are highly experienced in the tasks they will be <br />reviewing. Committing the appropriate staffing to the project is <br />the most important quality assurance measure. The quality <br />control team will be led by our project manager. <br />2. QC Reviews <br />These are normally divided into three major areas: 1) engineering design review (criteria); 2) plans <br />preparation /cross reference review; and 3) <br />constructability review. Providing for these will <br />assure the City the quality it is paying for. For the <br />review process, RJ Behar has developed <br />checklists of items that must be included on each <br />type of project. <br />3. QC Process <br />We will follow a process, which starts with the 1) <br />design originator, 2) it is sent to a checker, 3) it <br />goes back to the originator who reviews these <br />and determines which comments are to be <br />implemented, 4) The originator and checker meet <br />to discuss the comments and come to an <br />agreement on the implementation of the <br />comments; 5) If they cannot come to an <br />agreement the project manager will then make <br />that determination; 6) Comments are <br />implemented; and 7) Plans are back checked. All <br />of these steps will require initials and dates by the <br />individual(s) involved. <br />(FCH�7011! QRIC UIR <br />vFVGr.FR <br />OVA ❑.„ <br />o.a'x� o <br />OFflGN [HEUiR <br />0MGMTOR <br />0 0 <br />0 <br />8 <br />(HEfNFRIORIgN4i@ <br />0 nNUOOawFr.rs <br />4 R.J.Behar RFQ No. 14 -07 -02 1 Page 14. 4 <br />