Laserfiche WebLink
59 <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach | RFQ 26-07-01 <br />Continuing Professional Architectural and Engineering | General Civil Engineer <br />allowing phased implementation. <br /> »Value-engineering example – West Deerfield Drainage. Ross revised the ICPR drainage model <br />to route through an existing FDOT connection, which supported eliminating a proposed control <br />structure and an outfall to a County canal. Removing the structure removed its construction <br />cost, its permitting burden, and its long-term maintenance obligation, while the revised model <br />confirmed the required drainage performance was still met. This is a direct example of maintaining <br />performance and reducing cost at the same time. <br /> »Value-engineering example – City of Sunny Isles Beach, NE 172nd Street Roadway and Drainage <br />Improvements. On the City’s own NE 172nd Street project, Ross evaluated the existing exfiltration <br />trenches, gravity drainage wells, Intracoastal connection, and flap gate before advancing <br />roadway grading and pump improvements, and incorporated that serviceable infrastructure <br />into the recommended solution rather than assuming complete replacement. This controlled <br />construction cost while delivering the drainage and roadway performance the City required. <br />4.5.2 SCHEDULING AND ABILITY TO MEET DEADLINES <br />Continuing-services contracts require rapid mobilization and the ability to manage several assignments <br />at once. Ross’s scheduling process begins with a realistic baseline schedule built from the task-order WBS <br />rather than a generic commitment to a due date. <br />Developing the schedule. For each assignment, Robert identifies the required activities, their durations <br />and dependencies, the City and agency review periods, and the critical path, and sets internal completion <br />dates in advance of City deadlines so that QA/QC review is never compressed. This is the same earned- <br />value framework used for cost: progress is measured against the scheduled value of work, so schedule <br />slippage is visible early. <br />Maintaining the schedule. Schedule status is reviewed at each progress meeting and updated as work <br />advances. For active or time-sensitive assignments, Ross uses a short-interval look-ahead schedule. <br />Because permitting, utility coordination, survey work, and subsurface investigation typically sit on the <br />critical path, Ross maintains a permitting-and-coordination log that tracks each required approval, the <br />responsible agency and contact, planned and actual submittal dates, review periods, comments, response <br />dates, outstanding information, and anticipated approval dates. Pre-application meetings are requested <br />where they can clarify agency expectations and reduce avoidable review cycles. <br /> »Ability to meet deadlines across concurrent task orders. Ross monitors workload and personnel <br />availability throughout the contract. Melissa provides contract-level resource oversight, Robert <br />manages task-order staffing, and Raymond schedules technical reviews ahead of submission <br />deadlines. When necessary, qualified staff are supplemented or reassigned to maintain progress <br />while preserving continuity of the key personnel identified in this proposal, allowing Ross to meet <br />deadlines on several simultaneous assignments. <br /> »Managing schedule risk. Potential schedule risks: regulatory-review delays, incomplete records, <br />utility conflicts, unforeseen field conditions, material <br />availability, contractor coordination, weather, public-access <br />limitations, or changes in scope, are communicated when <br />identified, not held until the next submittal. Ross’s notice <br />describes the issue, the affected milestone, the anticipated <br />impact, available mitigation, the City decisions required, <br />and a recommended recovery plan such as resequencing <br />activities, adding resources, or advancing unaffected work <br />while protecting the City’s budget and objectives. <br /> »Scheduling challenge and how Ross solved it – City of <br />City of North Miami Engineering Design Services Biscayne Park Water Main <br />Extension – Robert J. Ross, PE, LEED AP was the Engineer of Record for the <br />water main extension task work order to extend the existing 6” water main <br />along NE 9th Ave. The project included coordination with the Public Works <br />Director Mr. Wisler Pierre-Louis to discuss the scope of work and Ross’s role on <br />the project. Approximately 1,000 linear feet of 6” PVC water main extension and <br />two new fire hydrants were designed along NE 9th Ave and connected into the <br />existing 6” on NE 10th Ave. Plans and profiles were designed for the water main <br />extension showing all of the conflicts in the roadway and swale areas. Permits <br />were obtained for this project through City of North Miami, Miami Dade County <br />Health Department, and Miami Dade Fire Department. The construction was <br />inspected, and certification was obtained through the Health Department. <br />There were no project delays – the project started on time and was completed <br />with no amendments, charge orders and the project was not stopped for any <br />reason. <br />Miami-Dade County Parks & Recreation Dept. - Biscayne Park Watermain Extension <br />City of North Miami, FL <br />Reference <br />City of North Miami <br />Wisler Pierre-Louis, P.E., <br />LEED AP – Public Works <br />Director <br />pwisler@northmiamifl.gov <br />305-895-9833 <br />Contract Amount <br /># <br />Key Project Features <br />Civil Engineering <br />Water Resources <br />Engineering <br />Completion <br />Engineering Services: <br />Start: 2013 <br />Completed: 2014