Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:~. North Bay Road Pedestrian/Emergency Vehicle Bridge and Town Center Observation Deck & Boardwalk <br />'...': ' <br />" " <br /> <br />Single Span has the following disadvantages: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. For this span length, a major increase in Construction Cost. <br />· Increase difficulty in construction. <br />· Increase Maintenance <br /> <br />2.] .2. Bridge Type Alternatives <br /> <br />Alternate I: Three-Span Prestressed Concrete Beam Brid2:e <br /> <br />This alternate consists of a three-span bridge with spans of approximately 43 ft. The three-span <br />bridge structure consisting of prestressed concrete beams with a composite CIP deck. The most <br />economical support for this span arrangement would be pile bents. In this case prestressed <br />concrete piles are driven and tied at the top with a conventionally reinforced concrete cap forming <br />a bent. To minimize impact to the vertical clearance at this crossing, AASHTO Type II girders are <br />recommended. Exhihit 1 shows the proposed cross section for Alternate I. <br /> <br />Our Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate for Alternative L a Three-Span Prestressed Concrete <br />Beam Bridge, is shown on Tahle 5.1. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Alternate II: Two-Span c.I.P. Post-Tensioned Flat Slab Brid2:e <br /> <br />The alternate consists of a two-span flat slab bridge. This option would minimize the impact to the <br />environment by requiring only om~-water pier. As mentioned above, the most economical type of <br />substructure would be a prestressed concrete piles bent. The proposed cast-in-place flat slab deck <br />would consist of an average 24" post-tensioned slab. The slab would be designed to take on all <br />construction and dead loads. The Post-Tensioning would be introduced to handle live load. <br /> <br />A cast-in-place structure would offer the additional opportunity to introduce aesthetic lines to the <br />crossing. Er:hihit 1 presents the typical cross section for Alternate I I. Our Preliminary <br />Construction Cost Estimate for Alternative II. a Post Tensioned Flat Slab, is shown on Tahle 5,2. <br /> <br />Alternate III: Sin2:le Span Cable-Stav / Flat Slab Brid2:e <br /> <br />Given the span length of this crossing and the low profile constraint, our recommended bridge <br />structure alternative for the single span structure consists of a cable-stayed bridge with a single <br />tapered pylon. The bridge deck would be a symmetrical post-tensioned concrete flat slab <br />constructed on false work (similar to that proposed for Alternate II). The flat slab deck would <br />consist of an average 24" slab post-tensioned. The slab would be designed to take on all <br />construction and dead loads. The post-tensioning would be introduced to handle pedestrian live <br />load and the stay cables would be designed to take the vehicular live load. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This alternate minimizes the depth of the structure to comply with given constraints. However, this <br />typc of structure is a costly alternative for this location; a cost which may not be justified at this <br />site. <br /> <br />Request for Qualifications No. 07-03-01 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 15 <br />